11.12.2012 Views

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Asian Media & Mass Communication Conference 2010 Osaka, Japan<br />

Neoliberalism is understood as a type of economic policy, a cultural structure, a set of<br />

particular attitudes toward individual responsibility, entrepreneurship and self-<br />

improvement. It is also a type of governmentality in the Foucauldian sense (Foucault<br />

2008, 218, 147, 145). The different dimensions of neoliberalism are believed to be<br />

implemented through market imperatives. For example, as part of the techniques of<br />

governmentality and cultural structure, individuals are viewed and trained as self<br />

enterprising and ratiocinative actors; their creativity needs to be unlocked and<br />

unleashed in a co-creationist production, through which the consumers create value<br />

for the corporate, all in a natural state of affairs. Apart from its different dimensions,<br />

neoliberal practices also takes many different routes with varying results globally.<br />

Neoliberalism is an evolving process and “construed as a historically specific,<br />

ongoing, and internal contradictory process of market-driven socio-spatial<br />

transformation, rather than as a fully actualized policy regime, ideological form, or<br />

regulatory framework” (Brenner and Theodore 2002, 253). Whether it is Latin<br />

American neoliberalism or Euro-American neoliberalism or postsocialist<br />

neoliberalism, neoliberalism is always hard to pin down, and there is lack of<br />

connection between rhetoric/definition and reality. It is said that the few instances of<br />

success have taken place in countries that have marched to their own drummers. The<br />

case of China, which has violated most rules in the neoliberal guidebook and yet<br />

followed the path of market-oriented direction in economic development, suggests<br />

that neoliberalism is a heterodox, rather than orthodox. Viewed this way, Chinese<br />

neoliberalism, as well as any other forms of neoliberalism, can be referred to, at best,<br />

as “actually existing neoliberalism.” This term, according to Brenner and Theodore<br />

(2002, 349), emphasizes “the contextual embeddedness of neoliberal restructuring<br />

projects insofar as they have been produced within national, regional, and local<br />

contexts defined by the legacies of inherited institutional frameworks, policy regimes,<br />

regulatory practices, and political struggles.” It recognizes the incoherence of marketoriented<br />

neoliberal pursuits in national restructuring projects.<br />

China is not only an actually existing neoliberalism but also actually existing<br />

postsocialism. Postsocialism is used to describe the incoherence of “socialism with<br />

Chinese characteristics”. It marks a discontinuity with the Maoist socialist tradition<br />

while retaining enough room for continuity with tradition – not just the socialist past<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!