11.12.2012 Views

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Asian Media & Mass Communication Conference 2010 Osaka, Japan<br />

is condoned, the Chinese government has recently in May, for the first time invoked the law<br />

that prohibits group licentious to prosecute 22 adults who practiced group sex and spouse<br />

swapping. One of them is a university professor, Ma Yaohai, 53 who has been sentenced to<br />

three and a half years imprisonment. The law prohibits any sexual activity between three or<br />

more people even when happening in a private place and between consenting adults. In her<br />

blog, Li Yinhe (2010), a prominent Chinese sexologist and activist criticizes the law as “the<br />

last draconian law left over from the Cultural Revolution” and calls for its abolition. Ma was<br />

the only one who pleaded not guilty and insisted that his victimless private sex life should not<br />

be criminalized. In earlier interviews, Ma told Chinese reporters that he joined the swinging<br />

subculture in 2004 after meeting with a 23-year old woman from the Internet who was a<br />

member of swingers club. In 2007, Ma started an Internet chat room in which more than 200<br />

swingers participate (Wong, 2010).<br />

When online netizens might perceive that they are in better control of their privacy, but in<br />

reality their privacy is compromised because of extensive state surveillance. Like Erwin’s<br />

(2000) study of the sex hotlines counselling service in Shanghai, online discussions of private<br />

relationships and sexual affairs allow the state to easily monitor netizens’ discursive practice<br />

of personal desires and fulfilments and to understand the reconfigured family and social<br />

relations. This is often followed by intervention either legally or through counselling and reeducation,<br />

or imposing social sanctions. The Muzimei incident in 2003 is an example of how<br />

an initial sense of online liberation and empowerment has in the end subjected the individual<br />

to greater state monitoring.<br />

In June 2003, Muzimei, a journalist and magazine columnist published her sexual adventures<br />

with multiple partners on her blog causing a sudden Internet frenzy. Her stories were viewed<br />

by millions online and developed into a national controversy. In an interview, she once said:<br />

"I do not oppose love, but I oppose loyalty. If love has to be based on loyalty, I will not<br />

choose love." In contemporary Chinese society, romantic love has become the moral standard<br />

for engaging in sexual behaviours, together with marriage and procreation, they become the<br />

legitimate and acceptable reasons for sex (Farrer, 2002). Sex independent of love though is<br />

not uncommon, especially among men (Pan, 2006), however the sexual double standard<br />

rendered Muzimei an amoral figure. "If a man does this," she said, "it's no big deal, but as a<br />

woman doing so, I draw lots of criticism." She also became a hot topic of debate in various<br />

chat rooms and discussion forums. Some admired her as a liberated woman, others reviled<br />

her as ‘shameless hussy’. Eventually in November, the state intervened and criticised<br />

Muzimei’s behaviour as morally corrupting and accused Sina.com, the portal hosting her blog<br />

as being socially irresponsible in giving her prominent featuring. In the end, Mu voluntarily<br />

took down her blog and resigned from her job. Her book was also banned by the government<br />

(Yardley, 2003).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Following the economic and social reforms in the 1980s, the government no longer openly<br />

represses and directly intervenes in the private lives of citizens. Nevertheless, this should not<br />

be taken as a triumph of private consumption over the state as is commonly assumed, such as<br />

in the following account:<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!