11.12.2012 Views

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Asian Media & Mass Communication Conference 2010 Osaka, Japan<br />

diverse audiences make meaning of, and respond critically to, these extraordinary spectacles and<br />

large-scale international affairs. The concept, necessity, and relevance of media education are<br />

explored alongside the challenges and complexities of its implementation. Examples of the<br />

students’ work and an examination of the teaching and learning processes highlight some of the<br />

realities of preparing students as critical scholars and active participants in globalized, mediasaturated<br />

society.<br />

Media Education: For a New Generation of Learners<br />

As social commentators and public intellectuals continue their fervent attempts to define the role<br />

of new generations in increasingly media-saturated environments, the characterizations of youth<br />

have ranged from vulnerable, uncritical audiences of popular culture to empowered, active<br />

players in the new media landscape. Yet young people themselves have few, if any, opportunities<br />

to be a part of that conversation or to carry out their own debates on the nature of their<br />

relationship to media culture. Formal educational institutions have largely ignored the issue<br />

altogether, while scholars in the field of media education have argued the necessity of studying<br />

these relationships and experiences for their impact on identity development. As Stephen<br />

Goodman (2003) asserts, “While the precise impact of this media consumption is subject to<br />

debate, it is clear that over time, as these messages are repeated in numerous forms day in and<br />

day out, they contribute to young people’s evolving sense of identity, community, and<br />

worldview” (p. 2). Likewise, David Buckingham (2003) states that “The media are embedded in<br />

the textures and routines of everyday life, and they provide many of the ‘symbolic resources’ we<br />

use to conduct and interpret our relationship and to define our identities” (p. 5). Schools have<br />

been slow to react or even actively resist addressing these realities for a variety of reasons,<br />

including fear, confusion, or lack of resources, support, and training (Butler, 2010). But the<br />

matter is growing urgent and the obvious disconnect between pedagogy and everyday life<br />

continues to pressure administrators and teachers in their efforts to manage classroom learning.<br />

Official curriculum needs to incorporate a study of the media in order to be relevant to the lives<br />

of individual youth and to the wider society they inhabit (Buckingham, 2003). Education should<br />

enable students to develop as critical media scholars in conjunction with their development<br />

outside of school as sophisticated media consumers, producers, editors, and distributors (Butler,<br />

2003).<br />

At its foundation, Buckingham (2003) describes media education as “the process of teaching and<br />

learning about the media,” while media literacy is “the outcome – the knowledge and skills<br />

learners acquire” (p. 4). Media education should involve critical thinking of, and active<br />

participation in, mainstream and user-generated content (Buckingham, 2003; Butler, 2010;<br />

Goodman, 2003; Hartley, Burgess, & Banks, 2008; Kellner & Share, 2007; Tyner, 1998). There<br />

is a common emphasis on both analysis and production that has been reasoned in several ways.<br />

507

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!