11.12.2012 Views

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

(Person) Percentage - Sabanci University Research Database

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Asian Media & Mass Communication Conference 2010 Osaka, Japan<br />

frustrations. In addition, writing instructors must generate effective ways to provide students<br />

with performance feedback while suppressing their own frustrations. Moreover, once written<br />

work has been returned to students, writing instructors also feel frustration over student<br />

performance, especially if they have spent a good deal of time providing feedback—which<br />

students sometimes seem to ignore. Finally, the survey indicates that writing instructors are<br />

frustrated with organizational expectations such as committee assignments or extracurricular<br />

requirements partly because of the time these extra tasks require.<br />

Category 2—Concerns Related to Emotional Labor Among Respondents<br />

Students who make the same writing mistakes repeatedly (6.48)<br />

Lack of student comprehension and application of assigned material (6.46)<br />

Students who have higher expectations then their achievable potential (5.23)<br />

Students not taking their written academic work seriously (6.70)<br />

Students not applying writing mechanics such as syntax, grammar, or punctuation (6.15)<br />

Faculty having to act more in a “policing” role rather than in a coaching role (4.84)<br />

Students submitting work that contradicts the instructor’s beliefs or ideas (3.02)<br />

Students not respecting the instructor or the required course work (4.64)<br />

Cultural differences and approaches (3.34)<br />

Respondents indicated that they felt students did not take written academic work seriously.<br />

Respondents reported the frustrations that arose when they saw students making the same writing<br />

mistakes despite their efforts to provide feedback or clarify usage rules. Some said this left them<br />

feeling unappreciated as teachers—which can lead to low morale and burnout. Respondents also<br />

expressed concerns about the ability of some students to do college-level work successfully<br />

without remedial assistance.<br />

Category 3—Effects of Emotional Labor on Respondents<br />

Low morale (5.20)<br />

Feelings of depression, anxiety, anger, or rage (4.89)<br />

Concerns over course evaluation results (5.16)<br />

Negative attitudes toward friends or family members (2.31)<br />

Lack of personal motivation (5.26)<br />

Negative attitudes about and toward students (4.26)<br />

Negative attitudes about and toward colleagues (3.41)<br />

Increased bonding among colleagues (4.59)<br />

Lack of positive self esteem (3.66)<br />

While no scenario in this category emerged as having an exceptionally high degree of<br />

significance, the effects of emotional labor cannot be ignored here because low morale and<br />

burnout in one individual, for example, can have a negative impact on others with whom that<br />

individual must interact. Low morale can impact student performance if they perceive that their<br />

teacher is not enthusiastic about the job. As Van der Sijde (1988) states, the school climate<br />

influences both the student and the teacher, which ultimately can impact the success of the<br />

institution.<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!