16.08.2019 Views

Periodoncia.e.Implantologia.Dental.de.Hall

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E Cuando el orificio <strong>de</strong> acceso al tornillo ocupa 50% <strong>de</strong> la posición intercuspí<strong>de</strong>a <strong>de</strong> la superficie oclusal, el material <strong>de</strong><br />

restauración que se usa para facilitar su remoción pue<strong>de</strong> estar propenso a <strong>de</strong>sgaste y potenciar las fuerzas no axiales<br />

con consecuencias mecánicas. La guía anterior pue<strong>de</strong> estar comprometida si el acceso al tornillo <strong>de</strong> restauración está<br />

localizado sobre las vías <strong>de</strong> excursión lateral o <strong>de</strong> protrusión.<br />

Lecturas adicionales<br />

Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic<br />

crowns on implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(3): 369-378.<br />

Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw- vs. cement-retained implant prostheses: a literature review. J Oral<br />

Implantol. 2012;38(3):298-307.<br />

Sherif S, Susarla SM, Hwang JW, Weber HP, Wright RF. Clinician- and patient-reported long-term evaluation of screw- and<br />

cement-retained implant restorations: a 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(6):993-999.<br />

Torrado E, Ercoli C, Al Mardini M, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Cordaro L. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of<br />

screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(6):532-537.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!