TRADITIONAL POSTER - ismrm
TRADITIONAL POSTER - ismrm
TRADITIONAL POSTER - ismrm
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Sessions<br />
2193. Characterization of Brain Tumor Using High Order Diffusion Imaging<br />
Chu-Yu Lee 1 , Chris Goettl 2 , Leslie C. Baxter 3 , John P. Karis 3 , Josef P. Debbins, 1,3<br />
1 Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; 2 College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix;<br />
3 Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix<br />
Brain neoplasms are typically characterized by contrast enhanced T1 imaging. Depending on the course of treatment, tumor reoccurrence remains a<br />
possibility, and can be difficult to distinguish from other enhancing areas, for example post-treatment radiation effects (PTRE), typically necrosis [1].<br />
Further, detailed information about the tumor heterogeneity as detected by standard MR methods is not generally available, but can play a significant role in<br />
characterizing and grading the tumor. In this work, a simple multi-b-value DWI sequence has been developed to better understand the heterogeneity and<br />
diffusion characteristics of different types of tumors, encountered during routine clinical scanning. The signal decay is fitted with two recently developed<br />
diffusion models: a stretched exponential (£\-DWI) [2] and a cumulant expansion (DKI) [3] model, where fitted parameters £\ and Kapp were shown to<br />
correlate the diffusion heterogeneity. We expected to see differences in alpha and K when the multi-b-value DWI sequence directed to the anatomy of<br />
interest, primarily due the heterogeneity of the more advanced tumors.<br />
2194. Tumor Enhancement in a Brain Glioma Model: An Intra-Individual Comparison of Half Dose<br />
Gadobenate Dimeglumine Vs Full Dose Gadopentetate Dimeglumine at 1.5 and 3 T<br />
Ulrike I. Attenberger 1 , Val M. Runge 2 , Jonathan Williams 3 , Henrik J. Michaely<br />
1 Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Manheim, Germany, Mannheim, Baden-<br />
Württemberg, Germany; 2 Scott & White Clinic and Hospital, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Department of<br />
Radiology , Temple, TX, United States; 3 Department of Radiology, , Scott & White Clinic and Hospital, Texas A&M University<br />
Health Science Center, Temple, TX, United States<br />
Regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), the injected dose level becomes very important, since NSF is reported to be related to gadolinium chelate<br />
injection in patients with an impaired renal function, depending upon chelate stability and dose. With gadobenate dimeglumine, a chelate with transient<br />
protein binding and a higher r1 relaxivity became available. Combining a high relaxivity chelate and 3 T offers multiple opportunities for dose reduction<br />
without loss in image quality. This was proven in a rat brain glioma model at 1.5 and 3 T, comparing half dose gadobenate dimeglumine vs full dose<br />
gadopentetate dimeglumine, a standard extracellular gadolinium chelate.<br />
2195. MRI Acceptance Protocol for the Multicenter GO Glioblastoma Project<br />
Sylvain Ollivro 1,2 , Pierre Antoine Eliat 3 , Eric Hitti, 2,3 , Loan Tran 1 , Jacques Donald de Certaines 1,4 , Hervé<br />
Saint-Jalmes 2,4<br />
1 Cancéropôle Grand Ouest, Rennes, France; 2 LTSI, INSERM, U642, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France; 3 PRISM, IFR<br />
140/Biogenouest, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France; 4 CRLCC, Rennes, France<br />
We have verified thanks to a specific common quality control that 7 MRI devices included in a multicenter clinical project, had homogenous and acceptable<br />
characteristics to allow quantification and comparison between parameters extracted from different patient images acquired on different sites and to permit<br />
correlation with biopsies. This quality control was established with sequences from the MRI protocol. The studied parameters slightly varied depending on<br />
the different sites and MRI manufacturers and were in the awaiting of the project. This kind of quality control procedure should be included at the early<br />
beginning of any multicenter clinical projects involving quantitative MRI.<br />
2196. Large Scale Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Comparator Agents<br />
Matthew J. Kuhn 1 , Howard A. Rowley 2 , Michael V. Knopp 3 , Kenneth R. Maravilla 4 , Zoran Rumboldt 5<br />
1 Radiology, University of Illinois at Peoria, Peoria, IL, United States; 2 Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United<br />
States; 3 Radiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; 4 Radiology and Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle,<br />
WA, United States; 5 Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States<br />
382 patients were randomized to receive 2 MR exams within 2 days to 2 weeks with equal 0.1mmo/kg doses of either gadobenate dimeglumine (N=382) or a<br />
comparator gadolinium agent. Blinded experts assessed post-contrast images for both qualitative (eg, global contrast enhancement, lesion-to-brain contrast,<br />
lesion delineation, internal lesion morphology and structure, tumor vascularization, and global image preference) and quantitative (eg, contrast-to-noise ratio<br />
[CNR]; percent lesion enhancement) efficacy parameters. In all six studies, images produced following administration of Gd-BOPTA demonstrated greater<br />
contrast enhancement, provided more diagnostic information including additional lesion detection, and were significantly preferred by experienced, blinded<br />
neuroradiologists.