Numerical Methods Contents - SAM
Numerical Methods Contents - SAM
Numerical Methods Contents - SAM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.2<br />
equality in (8.2.10) for y := (sgn(L j (t ∗ ))) n j=0 , t∗ := argmax t∈I<br />
∑ ni=0<br />
|L i (t)|.<br />
✷<br />
Example 8.2.3. (Generalized Lagrange polynomials<br />
for Hermite Interpolation)<br />
double nodes<br />
t 0 = 0, t 1 = 0, t 2 = 1, t 3 = 1 ⇒ n = 3<br />
(cubic Hermite interpolation).<br />
Explicit formulas for the polynomials → see<br />
(9.3.2).<br />
✸<br />
Cubic Hermite Polynomials<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
−0.2<br />
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />
t<br />
p 0<br />
p 1<br />
p 2<br />
p 3<br />
Fig. 99<br />
Proof. (for the L 2 -Norm)<br />
By △-inequality and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality<br />
‖I T (y)‖ L 2 (I) ≤ ∑ n<br />
j=0 |y j| ∥ ( )1<br />
∥ ∑n<br />
( )1<br />
∥L ∥L j 2 (I) ≤ j=0 |y j| 2 2 ∑n ∥ ∥<br />
∥L<br />
j=0 j 2 2<br />
L 2 (I) . ✷<br />
Terminology: Lebesgue constant of T : λ T := ∥ ∑ n<br />
i=0 |L i| ∥ L ∞ (I)<br />
Example 8.2.4 (Computation of the Lebesgue constant).<br />
I = [−1, 1], T = {−1 + 2k n }n k=0<br />
(uniformly spaced nodes)<br />
8.2.2 Conditioning of polynomial interpolation<br />
Ôº½ º¾<br />
supremum norm ‖f‖ L ∞ (I) := sup{|f(t)|: t ∈ I} , (8.2.7)<br />
Necessary for studying the conditioning: norms on vector space of continuous functions C(I), I ⊂ R<br />
Asymptotic estimate (with (8.2.3) and Stirling formula):<br />
for n = 2m<br />
|L m (1 − n 1 1 )| = n · 1n · 3n · · · · n−3<br />
n · n+1<br />
n · · · · 2n−1<br />
n (2n)!<br />
( ) 2<br />
=<br />
2n · 4n · · · · · n−2<br />
n · 1 (n − 1)2 2n ((n/2)!) 2 n! ∼ 2n+3/2<br />
π (n − 1) n<br />
Ôº¿ º¾<br />
L 2 -norm<br />
L 1 -norm<br />
∫<br />
‖f‖ 2 L 2 (I) := |f(t)| 2 dt , (8.2.8)<br />
∫I<br />
‖f‖ L 1 (I) := |f(t)| dt . (8.2.9)<br />
I<br />
Theory [6]: for uniformly spaced nodes λ T ≥ Ce n/2 for C > 0 independent of n.<br />
Example 8.2.5 (Oscillating interpolation polynomial: Runge’s counterexample).<br />
✸<br />
✬<br />
Lemma 8.2.5 (Absolute conditioning of polynomial interpolation).<br />
Given a mesh T ⊂ R with generalized Lagrange polynomials L i , i = 0,...,n, and fixed<br />
I ⊂ R, the norm of the interpolation operator satisfies<br />
‖I T (y)‖ L<br />
‖I T ‖ ∞→∞ := sup<br />
∞ (I)<br />
= ∥ ∑ n<br />
y∈K n+1 \{0} ‖y‖ ∞<br />
i=0 |L i| ∥ , L ∞ (I) (8.2.10)<br />
‖I T (y)‖ L<br />
‖I T ‖ 2→2 := sup<br />
2 (I)<br />
(∑ n<br />
≤<br />
y∈K n+1 \{0} ‖y‖ 2<br />
i=0 ‖L i‖ 2 )1<br />
2<br />
L 2 . (8.2.11)<br />
(I)<br />
✫<br />
Proof. (for the L ∞ -Norm)<br />
By △-inequality<br />
‖I T (y)‖ L ∞ (I) = ∥ ∥∥∥ ∑ n<br />
j=0 y jL j<br />
∥ ∥∥∥L ∞ (I)<br />
≤ sup<br />
t∈I<br />
∑ n<br />
j=0 |y j||L j (t)| ≤ ‖y‖ ∞<br />
∥ ∥∥ ∑ n<br />
i=0 |L i|∥<br />
∥ L ∞ (I) ,<br />
✩<br />
✪<br />
Ôº¾ º¾<br />
Between the nodes the interpolation polynomial can oscillate excessively and overestimate the changes<br />
in the values: bad approximation of functions!<br />
Interpolation polynomial with uniformly spaced<br />
nodes:<br />
See example 8.4.3.<br />
{ } n<br />
T := −5 + 10<br />
n j , j=0<br />
y j = 1<br />
1 + t 2 , j = 0, ... n.<br />
j<br />
Plot n = 10 ➙<br />
Interpolation polynomial<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Interpol. polynomial<br />
−0.5<br />
−5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
t<br />
Ôº º¾