21.06.2014 Views

Numerical Methods Contents - SAM

Numerical Methods Contents - SAM

Numerical Methods Contents - SAM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

✬<br />

Theorem 10.4.1 (Existence of n-point quadrature formulas of order 2n).<br />

Let { ¯Pn<br />

}n∈N 0<br />

be a family of non-zero polynomials that satisfies<br />

• ¯P n ∈ P n ,<br />

∫ 1<br />

• q(t) ¯P n (t) dt = 0 for all q ∈ P n−1 (L 2 (] − 1, 1[)-orthogonality),<br />

−1<br />

• The set {ξj n}m j=1 , m ≤ n, of real zeros of ¯P n is contained in [−1, 1].<br />

Then<br />

✫<br />

Q n (f) :=<br />

m∑<br />

ωj n f(ξn j )<br />

j=1<br />

with weights chosen according to Rem. 10.3.11 provides a quadrature formula of order 2n on<br />

[−1, 1].<br />

✩<br />

✪<br />

Definition 10.4.2 (Legendre polynomials).<br />

The n-th Legendre polynomial P n is defined<br />

by<br />

• P n ∈ P n ,<br />

∫ 1<br />

• P n (t)q(t) dt = 0 ∀q ∈ P n−1 ,<br />

−1<br />

• P n (1) = 1.<br />

−1<br />

Legendre polynomials P 0 , . ..,P 5 ➣<br />

−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1<br />

P n<br />

(t)<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

−0.2<br />

−0.4<br />

−0.6<br />

−0.8<br />

Legendre polynomials<br />

t<br />

n=0<br />

n=1<br />

n=2<br />

n=3<br />

n=4<br />

n=5<br />

Fig. 114<br />

Notice: the polynomials ¯P n defined by (10.4.5) and the Legendre polynomials P n of Def. 10.4.2<br />

(merely) differ by a constant factor!<br />

Proof. Conclude from the orthogonality of the ¯P { } n<br />

n that ¯P k k=0 is a basis of P n and<br />

∫ 1<br />

h(t) ¯P n (t) dt = 0 ∀h ∈ P n−1 . (10.4.6)<br />

−1<br />

Recall division of polynomials with remainder (Euclid’s algorithm → Course “Diskrete Mathematik”):<br />

Ôº ½¼º<br />

Gauss points ξ n j = zeros of Legendre polynomial P n<br />

Note: the above considerations, recall (10.4.4), show that the nodes of an n-point quadrature formula<br />

Ôº ½¼º<br />

for any p ∈ P 2n−1<br />

p(t) = h(t) ¯P n (t) + r(t) , for some h ∈ P n−1 , r ∈ P n−1 . (10.4.7)<br />

of order 2n on [−1, 1] must agree with the zeros of L 2 (] − 1, 1[)-orthogonal polynomials.<br />

Apply this representation to the integral:<br />

∫1 ∫1<br />

p(t) dt = h(t) ¯P n (t) dt<br />

−1<br />

−1<br />

} {{ }<br />

=0 by (10.4.6)<br />

∫1<br />

+<br />

−1<br />

r(t) dt (∗) =<br />

m∑<br />

ωj n r(ξn j ) , (10.4.8)<br />

j=1<br />

✗<br />

✖<br />

n-point quadrature formulas of order 2n are unique<br />

This is not surprising in light of “2n equations for 2n degrees of freedom”.<br />

✔<br />

✕<br />

(∗): by choice of weights according to Rem. 10.3.11 Q n is exact for polynomials of degree ≤ n − 1!<br />

!<br />

We are not done yet: the zeros of ¯P n from (10.4.5) may lie outside [−1, 1].<br />

In principle ¯P n could also have less than n real zeros.<br />

By choice of nodes as zeros of ¯P n using (10.4.6):<br />

m∑<br />

j=1<br />

ωj n p(ξn j ) (10.4.7)<br />

=<br />

m∑<br />

ωj n h(ξn j ) ¯P<br />

m∑<br />

n (ξj n } {{ }<br />

) +<br />

j=1 =0 j=1<br />

ωj n r(ξn j ) (10.4.8)<br />

=<br />

∫1<br />

−1<br />

p(t) dt .<br />

✷<br />

The next lemma shows that all this cannot happen.<br />

The family of polynomials { ¯P n<br />

}n∈N 0<br />

are so-called orthogonal polynomials w.r.t. the L 2 (] − 1, 1[)-<br />

inner product. They play a key role in analysis.<br />

Ôº ½¼º<br />

Ôº¼¼ ½¼º

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!