12.07.2015 Views

Contributions à l'Etude du Vertex Topologique en Théorie ... - Toubkal

Contributions à l'Etude du Vertex Topologique en Théorie ... - Toubkal

Contributions à l'Etude du Vertex Topologique en Théorie ... - Toubkal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

326 L.B. Drissi et al. / Nuclear Physics B 804 [PM] (2008) 307–3415. Field model for O(−3) → E (t,∞)We first study the gauge invariant supersymmetric field model with target space giv<strong>en</strong> by thecurve E (t,∞) = ∂P 2 . For details on the deg<strong>en</strong>erate elliptic curve E (t,∞) ,seeApp<strong>en</strong>dix A. Th<strong>en</strong>,we consider the ext<strong>en</strong>sion to O(−3) → E (t,∞) .5.1. Divisors of local P 2To begin, notice that the local P 2 Eq. (4.7) has several divisors; i.e., codim<strong>en</strong>sion one subspacesdescribing boundary patches of the normal bundle of the projective plane.The standard ones are obtained by setting one of the z i ’s to zero; z i = 0 with i = 0, 1, 2, 3.5.1.1. Toric boundary of P 2In this paragraph, we consider the three following complex surfaces [D 1 ], [D 2 ] and [D 3 ],[D 1 ]: |z 2 | 2 +|z 3 | 2 − 3|z 0 | 2 = t ⇔ z 1 = 0,[D 2 ]: |z 3 | 2 +|z 1 | 2 − 3|z 0 | 2 = t ⇔ z 2 = 0,[D 3 ]: |z 1 | 2 +|z 2 | 2 − 3|z 0 | 2 = t ⇔ z 3 = 0,and their union [D]=[D 1 ]∪[D 2 ]∪[D 3 ].To see what this local geometry describes precisely; let us set |z 0 | 2 = 0 in above equationsfrom where one sees that each relation describes a complex one dim<strong>en</strong>sion projective line P 1 .Todistinguish betwe<strong>en</strong> these complex projective lines, we use the conv<strong>en</strong>tion notation P 1 iwhere thesubindex i refers to z i = 0. Thus we have(5.1)P 1 1 : |z 2| 2 +|z 3 | 2 = t,P 1 2 : |z 3| 2 +|z 1 | 2 = t,P 1 3 : |z 1| 2 +|z 2 | 2 = t.(5.2)As we see, these projective lines have the following intersection matrix 6( )−2 1 1P 1 i ∩ P1 j = 1 −2 1 ,(5.3)1 1 −2from which one sees that the complex curveE (t,∞) = P 1 1 ∪ P1 2 ∪ P1 3 ,is elliptic (E (t,∞) ∼ T 2 ). Indeed, computing3∑E (t,∞) ∩ E (t,∞) = P 1 i ∩ P1 i + 2( P 1 1 ∩ P1 2 + P1 2 ∩ P1 3 + P1 3 ∩ 1) P1 ,i=1we get, up on using (5.3),E (t,∞) ∩ E (t,∞) =−3 × 2 + 2 × 3 = 0.(5.4)(5.5)(5.6)6 D<strong>en</strong>oting by {α 1 ,α 2 ,α 3 },abasisofH 2 (P 2 ,R), and by {A 1 ,A 2 ,A 3 }, the <strong>du</strong>al basis of H 2 (P 2 ,R)with ∫ A i α j = δ i j ,the intersection matrix Eq. (5.3) is giv<strong>en</strong> by I ij = ∫ P 2 α i ∧ α j .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!