07.10.2013 Views

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sociology 75<br />

writers like Max Weber <strong>the</strong> construct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> specific types has even been consid-<br />

ered <strong>the</strong> core <strong>of</strong> sociological underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Here aga<strong>in</strong> it is useful to ask what<br />

might be meant by a type if <strong>the</strong> idea is reduced to <strong>the</strong> parsimony <strong>of</strong> variate<br />

language.<br />

Logicians have created <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> attribute space. It is obviously possible to<br />

take a set <strong>of</strong> variates <strong>and</strong> to f<strong>in</strong>d all possible comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Each s<strong>in</strong>gle comb<strong>in</strong>a-<br />

tion might be called a type or some sub-sets <strong>of</strong> such comb<strong>in</strong>ations. Weber for<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance has given eight attributes <strong>of</strong> a perfect bureaucracy. Obviously one can<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> structures which have only some <strong>of</strong> those characteristics <strong>and</strong><br />

describe <strong>the</strong>m as types. L<strong>in</strong>guists have made typologies <strong>of</strong> languages by cornb<strong>in</strong>-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g various phonetic characteristics. For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present review <strong>the</strong><br />

reverse aspect is more relevant. Suppose that a writer has <strong>in</strong>tuitively developed<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> types. Would it be possible to propose a system <strong>of</strong> variates from which<br />

such a typology might have derived? Because this idea wil become relevant <strong>in</strong><br />

subsequent sections one example <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> substruction wil be given here.<br />

Erich Fromm has proposed that <strong>the</strong> relation <strong>of</strong> young people to <strong>the</strong>ir parents<br />

can be classified <strong>in</strong>to four types: complete authority, simple authority, lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> authority <strong>and</strong> rebellion. It so happened that questionnaires were available<br />

for a sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> young people, to provide <strong>in</strong>formation as to how <strong>the</strong>y felt<br />

toward <strong>the</strong>ir parents.<br />

The authority relationship <strong>in</strong> a family is classified by <strong>the</strong> way <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong><br />

parents exercise <strong>the</strong>ir authority <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> children accept it.<br />

Through questionnaires, <strong>the</strong> parental exercise <strong>of</strong> authority was rated as ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

strong, moderate or weak; likewise, <strong>the</strong> children’s acceptance <strong>of</strong> authority was<br />

rated as high, weak or low. Logically, this makes n<strong>in</strong>e comb<strong>in</strong>ations possible.<br />

A variate-space substructed for a typology <strong>of</strong> family relationships<br />

Children’s acceptance<br />

High Medium Low<br />

Strong I 2 3<br />

I I IV<br />

Parents’ exercise Moderate 4 5 6<br />

I1 I1 IV<br />

Weak I 8 9<br />

I11<br />

This scheme can be related to Fromm’s four types, which were, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>ally conceived from very different qualitative considerations.<br />

Fromm’s type Variate Exercise<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />

Accept ance<br />

I Complete authority I <strong>and</strong> 2 Strong High or medium<br />

II Simple authority 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 Moderate High or medium<br />

111 Lack <strong>of</strong> authority 8 Weak Medium<br />

IV Rebellion 3 <strong>and</strong> 6 Strong or Moderate Low

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!