07.10.2013 Views

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

704 Eric Trist<br />

colleges <strong>in</strong> 1960. The table br<strong>in</strong>gs out po<strong>in</strong>ts which rema<strong>in</strong> generally true at <strong>the</strong><br />

present time but are not commonly recognized:<br />

a. <strong>the</strong> substantial numbers <strong>of</strong> faculty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> basic <strong>social</strong> science discipl<strong>in</strong>es -just<br />

over half <strong>of</strong> those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural sciences;<br />

b. that faculty <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>and</strong> applied fields deriv<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> scien-<br />

ces exceed those <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>and</strong> applied fields deriv<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> natural<br />

sciences;<br />

c. that, as compared with <strong>the</strong> natural sciences, <strong>the</strong> academic <strong>research</strong> strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> sciences is <strong>of</strong> altoge<strong>the</strong>r a lower order <strong>of</strong> magnitude.<br />

UNITED STATES. Number <strong>of</strong> faculty <strong>in</strong> basic <strong>social</strong> <strong>and</strong> naturalscience <strong>and</strong> relatedpr<strong>of</strong>es-<br />

sional <strong>and</strong> applied discipl<strong>in</strong>es (196.2)’ <strong>and</strong> those engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>in</strong> academic <strong>in</strong>stitu-<br />

tions (1960)~<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e Social Natural S.S.<br />

sciences sciences -% N.S.<br />

Basic<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>and</strong> applied<br />

12.920 22,450 58.0<br />

25,690 22,390 115.0<br />

38,610 44.840 86.0<br />

Numbers engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>research</strong> 8,000 47.000 17.0<br />

a The source used for <strong>the</strong>se computations is R. E. DUNHAM <strong>and</strong> P. S. WRIOHT,<br />

Teach<strong>in</strong>g Faculty <strong>in</strong> Higher Education 1962-3.11<br />

From NSP data for 1960 quoted <strong>in</strong> Annex 25 <strong>of</strong> National Science Policies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

U.S.A.3‘ The data refer to total numbers engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>in</strong> higher education<br />

(physical <strong>and</strong> life scientists <strong>and</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers v. <strong>social</strong> scientists - technicians, assistants,<br />

etc. excluded). They provide <strong>the</strong> closest comparison with <strong>the</strong> OE data that could be<br />

found. The figures should be compared with those under ‘Higher Education’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Table for Employment <strong>of</strong> Scientists by Sector (p. 705).<br />

13. The grow<strong>in</strong>g salience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essions deriv<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> sciences is a<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ter to <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>in</strong>dustrial society. The discrepancy between<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>and</strong> basic faculty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> as compared with <strong>the</strong> natural scien-<br />

ces suggests that <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essions have rema<strong>in</strong>ed split to too great an<br />

extent from <strong>the</strong>ir underly<strong>in</strong>g sciences. If many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se cannot yet supply <strong>the</strong><br />

equivalent underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, much <strong>of</strong> what is available is not be<strong>in</strong>g effectively used.<br />

The discrepancy between <strong>the</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g position shows that even a<br />

society such as <strong>the</strong> United States, while accept<strong>in</strong>g services dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>social</strong> sciences, has not yet recognized that <strong>the</strong>ir improvement can result only<br />

from a <strong>research</strong> effort on ano<strong>the</strong>r scale from anyth<strong>in</strong>g yet attempted. The<br />

position at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade wil undoubtedly be better than it was at <strong>the</strong><br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, yet it is unlikely that <strong>the</strong> ‘phase change’ required wil have occurred.<br />

Though <strong>the</strong> discrepancy <strong>in</strong> manpower terms looks less than it does <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

terms, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exorbitant costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>in</strong> some areas especially <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> physical sciences, it never<strong>the</strong>less represents an anachronism.*<br />

* To <strong>the</strong> question recently put by Kenneth Bould<strong>in</strong>g,6 ‘Do we take <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> sciences<br />

seriously? <strong>the</strong> answer might be: from <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> service <strong>and</strong> education, ‘yes’;<br />

from <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong>, ‘no’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!