07.10.2013 Views

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The place <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sciences <strong>of</strong> man <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> sciences 45<br />

namely (a), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir derived epistemology (d), it becomes clear that <strong>the</strong> object<br />

<strong>of</strong> logic cannot be entirely separated from <strong>the</strong> subject, <strong>in</strong> so far as logic formalizes<br />

operational structures built up by <strong>the</strong> latter; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sciences<br />

must become circular once aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

This circularity is <strong>in</strong>deed extremely <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g when we study <strong>the</strong> epistemology<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sciences <strong>of</strong> man, for it reflects <strong>the</strong> fundamental circle which characterizes<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-action <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> object: <strong>the</strong> subject is only aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> object through its own activities, but can only learn to know itself through<br />

its action upon <strong>the</strong> object. Physics is thus a science <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> object, but it only<br />

reaches <strong>the</strong> object through <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediary <strong>of</strong> logico-ma<strong>the</strong>matical structures<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject. Biology is ano<strong>the</strong>r science <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

object, but <strong>the</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g it studies, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struments borrowed <strong>in</strong> part from<br />

physico-chemistry, is at <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g-po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviour pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> a subject which leads to <strong>the</strong> <strong>human</strong> subject. In study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> latter, psychology<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sciences <strong>of</strong> man use some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> techniques <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier sciences, but <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>human</strong> subject also builds up logico-ma<strong>the</strong>matical structures which provide a<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g-po<strong>in</strong>t for <strong>the</strong> formalizations <strong>of</strong> logic <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matics. In sum, <strong>the</strong><br />

scientific system as a whole is caught up <strong>in</strong> an endless spiral, <strong>the</strong> circular motion<br />

<strong>of</strong> which has no negative effects <strong>in</strong> itself but simply gives expression to <strong>the</strong> dialectic<br />

between subject <strong>and</strong> object <strong>in</strong> its most general form.<br />

One thus sees that <strong>the</strong> sciences <strong>of</strong> man, while rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most difficult <strong>and</strong><br />

complex, occupy a privileged position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific circle: as sciences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

subject which itself builds up <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sciences, <strong>the</strong>y cannot be separated from<br />

<strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>rs without be<strong>in</strong>g artificially simplified <strong>and</strong> distorted; but if <strong>the</strong> <strong>human</strong><br />

subject is put back <strong>in</strong> his proper place, which is at <strong>the</strong> same time that <strong>of</strong> a culm<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical <strong>and</strong> biological object, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> a<br />

creative start<strong>in</strong>g-po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> action <strong>and</strong> reflexion, <strong>the</strong> sciences <strong>of</strong><br />

man alone render <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g, or ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal coherence, <strong>of</strong> this circle <strong>of</strong><br />

sciences <strong>in</strong>telligible.<br />

7. Major <strong>the</strong>oretical <strong>trends</strong>: forecast <strong>and</strong> explanation<br />

I. In so far as <strong>the</strong> sciences <strong>of</strong> man cannot be isolated, but are part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

complex <strong>of</strong> sciences, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> so far as this complex assumes a generally circular<br />

or spiral form, <strong>the</strong> problem which dom<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical <strong>trends</strong> is<br />

assuredly that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specificity or, on <strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>the</strong> reducible character, <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> phenomena studied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> different branches <strong>of</strong> science; for if <strong>the</strong> concepts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terdependence are gradually tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> place <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear series<br />

or simple genealogical structures, <strong>the</strong> question naturally arises whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

trend is towards general assimilation, or towards relational or dialectical<br />

modes <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> which both oppositions <strong>and</strong> analogies are taken <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account.<br />

This is no mere academic question, but a very real problem. In psychology<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a tendency to reduce observable facts to physiology on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> to sociology on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, while overlook<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> specificity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mental<br />

factor. In sociology, <strong>the</strong>re is a tendency to reduce behaviour to a scale close to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!