07.10.2013 Views

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250 Jean Piaget<br />

tion, one trend be<strong>in</strong>g concerned with sexual life <strong>and</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g faithful to <strong>the</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g reductionism <strong>of</strong> Freud, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> ego <strong>and</strong> conscious<br />

thought <strong>and</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g to constructivism <strong>and</strong> structuralism.<br />

It is <strong>in</strong> fact possible to dist<strong>in</strong>guish six different <strong>trends</strong> <strong>in</strong> contemporary analytical<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> it is worth go<strong>in</strong>g over <strong>the</strong>m as <strong>the</strong>re are some divergences <strong>of</strong><br />

doctr<strong>in</strong>e that cast quite an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g light on <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> psychological<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> difficulties that constructivist structuralism has <strong>in</strong><br />

ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g general acceptance, even though’ it may be <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> most<br />

general present-day <strong>trends</strong>.<br />

III. I) The fist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>trends</strong> is <strong>in</strong> some respects regressive <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> effect lays<br />

even greater emphasis on <strong>the</strong> reductionist character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Freudian doctr<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

This approach is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MBlanie Kle<strong>in</strong> school, which takes <strong>the</strong> image as <strong>the</strong><br />

almost halluc<strong>in</strong>atory realization <strong>of</strong> desires, memory <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> memory ima-<br />

ges <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> various Freudian complexes even fur<strong>the</strong>r back than before. But<br />

writers who do not belong to this Kle<strong>in</strong>ian sub-school <strong>of</strong> thought f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>fant thus becomes curiously assimilable to <strong>the</strong> ‘m<strong>in</strong>iature adult’ which has<br />

constantly been denounced by non-psychoanalytic child psychology as a prod-<br />

uct similar to those <strong>of</strong> preformism <strong>in</strong> embryology.<br />

2) The second tendency, like some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>trends</strong>, is adopted by<br />

authors who are not content to reconstruct <strong>the</strong> stages <strong>of</strong> development on <strong>the</strong><br />

basis <strong>of</strong> a few cl<strong>in</strong>ical observations (or, like Freud himself, childhood memories<br />

revived by adults undergo<strong>in</strong>g treatment), but who carry out experimentation prop-<br />

erly so-called, which is someth<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong> psychoanalysis. They <strong>in</strong>clude E. Kris,<br />

Spitz <strong>and</strong> K. Wolf, Th. Benedek <strong>and</strong> Th. Gou<strong>in</strong>-Dkarie. Their basic idea is<br />

that development consists <strong>of</strong> constructions as such affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ego <strong>and</strong> that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a correlation between <strong>the</strong> stages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> manifestations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> libido <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> stages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ego. In <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, for<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, a first stage will be dist<strong>in</strong>guished at which he is centred on himself but<br />

still without any differentiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ego <strong>in</strong> relation to o<strong>the</strong>r persons <strong>and</strong> ob-<br />

jects, <strong>the</strong> environment be<strong>in</strong>g known only through <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject.<br />

A second stage is reached when expectation responses <strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> privileged<br />

perceptions (smiles) <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a boundary, though shift<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

between activity proper <strong>and</strong> ‘<strong>in</strong>termediate objects’ like <strong>the</strong> ‘smil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>human</strong> face’<br />

(Spitz). Lastly, a third stage is reached when <strong>the</strong>re is a firm differentiation be-<br />

tween <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> object <strong>and</strong> a consequent consciousness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ego <strong>and</strong> a<br />

‘ca<strong>the</strong>xis <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g truly libid<strong>in</strong>al objects’, or an object-directed fixation <strong>of</strong> affec-<br />

tivity on <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> so on. As a result <strong>of</strong> experiments carried out on go<br />

babies, when she adopted our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cognitive formation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> permanent object (look<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> object after it has disappeared from sight<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d a screen, which is by no means <strong>in</strong>nate), Th. Gou<strong>in</strong>-DBcarie was able to<br />

show a fairly good correlation between our stages <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> pre-objectali<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>n objectal affectivity (though only relatively, because although it was con-<br />

firmed that <strong>the</strong> cognitive stages followed a constant order, those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘libido’<br />

are not so sequential <strong>and</strong> reversals occur). We are <strong>the</strong>refore on <strong>the</strong> way to con-<br />

structivism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!