Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Sociology I 65
230. G. A. DE Vos, ‘Achievement and Innovation in Culture and Personality’, in: E.
NORBECK, et. al. (eds.), op. cit., p. 340
23 I. Eg., A. TAKHMASIB, The Change of the Azerbaidzleanese Womens’ Personality
under New Social Conditions.
232. A background paper for the present report has been prepared by CHARLES
TURNER; it is available by writing to Columbia University’s Bureau of Applied
Social Research, 605 W. 115th Street, New York, N.Y. 10027.
233. R. BROWN, Social Psychology, New York, Free Press, 1965 (Chap. XIII, ‘Group
Dynamics’, pp. 654 ff.)
234. A sophisticated example is C. FAUCHEUX and S. MOSCOVICI, ‘Etude sur la cr6ativitb
des groupes: tlche, structure des communications et rkussite’, in: P. F.
LAZARSFELD and R. BOUDON (eds.), Vocabulaire des Sciences Sociales (Vol. I.,
Collection ‘Mbhodes de la Sociologie’), Paris, Mouton & Co., 1965.
235. H. H. KELLEY and J. W. THIBAUT, ‘Group Problem Solving’, in: The Handbook of
Social Psychology, Vol. IV, op. cit. These authors also provide further details on
the emerging aspects of problem-solving which have been alluded to in the preceding
paragraphs without special reference.
236. M. MULDER, Group Structure Motivation and Group Performance, The Hague-
Paris, Mouton & Co., 1963.
237. C. A. GIBE, ‘An International View of the Emergence of Leadership’, Australian
Journal ofPsychoZogy IO, pp. 101-1 IO.
238. R. F. BALES, ‘The Equilibrium Problem in Small Groups’, in: T. PARSONS, R. F.
BALES and E. A. SHILS (eds.), Working Papers in the Theory of Action, Glencoe
(Il.). The Free Press of Glencoe, 1953, pp. 111-161.
239. While it belongs to an earlier period, one should always come back to the classical
work by F. MEREI. First he allowed play groups of children to develop their own
leadership structure and playing norms ; he then changed the natural leaders between
groups and observed how the ensuing combination of leadership and
group forms (Human Relations, 1949).
240. Something of this kind has been done in the field of training and counseling, but I
do not feel competent to judge its merit: L. P. BRADFORD, J. R. GIBB and K. D.
BENNE (eds.), T-Group Theory and Laboratory Method Innovation in Re-Education,
New York, John Wiley, 1964.
241. The quotations are taken from C. W. BACKMAN and P. E. SECOURD (eds.), Problems
in Social Psychology. In this carefully edited collection further examples related
to the present topic can be found.
242. A brief summary can be found in the book cited in note 201.
243. While they are not based on experiment, the numerous brilliant essays by Erving
Goffman provide many pertinent examples.
244. P. H. MAUCORPS and R. BASSOUL, ‘Le dialogue du moi et d’autrui’, and P. F.
LAZARSFELD and R. BOUDON, ‘Remarques sur la signification formelle de deux
indices’, in: P. F. LAZARSFELD and R. BOUDON (eds.), op. cit.
245. R. D. LAING, H. PHILLIPSON and A. R. LEE, Interpersonal Perception, London,
Tavistock Publications; New York, Springer, 1966.
246. J. MAISONNEUVE,
La Dynamique des Groupes, Paris, Presses universitaires de France,
1968.
247. P. R. HOFSTATTER, Gruppendynamik. Die Kritik der Massenpsychologie, Hamburg,
Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 1957.
248. W. J. SPROTT, Human Groups, Baltimore, Pelican Books, 1962.
249. D. ANZIEU and J. Y. MARTIN, La Dynamique des Groupes Restreints, Paris, Presses
universitaires de France, 1968.
250. J. STOETZEL, La Psychologie Sociale, Paris, Flammarion, 1963.
251. H. TAJFEL,
Psychology, Vol. 11, op. cit.
‘Social and Cultural Factors in Perception’, in: The HandbookofSocial