07.10.2013 Views

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180 W. J. M. Mackenzie<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> 5 m. a year. The cost <strong>of</strong> stor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g would be<br />

$1 m. a year now, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g to $5 m. <strong>in</strong> 1975.<br />

These dollar costs seem much too low: but even if <strong>the</strong>y were doubled or<br />

trebled <strong>the</strong> sums <strong>in</strong>volved would be trivial by <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> natural science,<br />

<strong>and</strong> not large <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> amounts already spent by governments on<br />

aggregative data <strong>and</strong> by various agencies on survey data. The cost envisaged<br />

by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Deutsch is not <strong>the</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> data; but <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> storage <strong>and</strong><br />

process<strong>in</strong>g, designed to squeeze all that can be squeezed from data which already<br />

exist.<br />

Most political scientists would agree that this is worth do<strong>in</strong>g, so long as <strong>the</strong><br />

cost is not borne by <strong>the</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>e itself from its exist<strong>in</strong>g resources: subject,<br />

perhaps, to two o<strong>the</strong>r provisos.<br />

i) Emphasis on statistics may have a ‘skew’ effect on <strong>research</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests. It is<br />

an obvious corollary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> stages that <strong>the</strong> fewest <strong>and</strong> least reliable<br />

data are those from <strong>the</strong> poorest countries: <strong>and</strong> that even with rich countries<br />

<strong>the</strong> data are least good for areas (family life, for <strong>in</strong>stance) which have not yet<br />

been fully drawn <strong>in</strong>to ‘modernized’ society. Both <strong>the</strong>se sectors are <strong>of</strong> tremendous<br />

political importance, <strong>and</strong> statistics do not take us very far <strong>in</strong> analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m. It<br />

is important never<strong>the</strong>less to get <strong>research</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g by such techniques as we can<br />

apply at once: this will <strong>in</strong> due course dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> numerical data.<br />

ii) As a matter <strong>of</strong> historical accident, we have begun to talk first <strong>of</strong> world data<br />

banks <strong>of</strong> political <strong>in</strong>dicators. These data are <strong>of</strong> course to be correlated with<br />

economic <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> data: but <strong>the</strong>re are apparently no similar plans for econo-<br />

mic <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> data banks. It would be scientifically correct that <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> world data should be treated as a s<strong>in</strong>gle problem, giv<strong>in</strong>g no special<br />

priority to political science.<br />

But suppos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cost were to be borne from funds already allocated for<br />

political <strong>research</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re would undoubtedly be a dispute about <strong>the</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

priorities. As will be seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second ma<strong>in</strong> section <strong>of</strong> this article, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> for which <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong> data banks is not important;<br />

serious <strong>research</strong> can be pursued (<strong>and</strong> is be<strong>in</strong>g pursued) without recourse to ‘<strong>the</strong><br />

language <strong>of</strong> variables’.<br />

JII. ECOLOGY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE<br />

It was suggested earlier <strong>in</strong> this chapter (p. 167) that differences <strong>of</strong> approach to<br />

political science could to some extent be measured on <strong>the</strong>se three dimensions;<br />

that <strong>of</strong> attitude to <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>e, that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> study, <strong>and</strong><br />

that <strong>of</strong> basic assumptions <strong>and</strong> methods. These are to some extent matters <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual choice, to some extent <strong>the</strong>y are settled by <strong>the</strong> tendencies <strong>of</strong> schools<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>research</strong> groups. But <strong>the</strong>re are also national differences, <strong>and</strong> (at first sight<br />

at least) <strong>the</strong>se differences reflect forms <strong>of</strong> academic organization ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

ideologies.<br />

One may dist<strong>in</strong>guish three cases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!