07.10.2013 Views

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ma<strong>the</strong>matical models <strong>and</strong> methods 561<br />

which would be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by apply<strong>in</strong>g one or o<strong>the</strong>r group <strong>of</strong> restrictions to <strong>the</strong><br />

rules <strong>of</strong> grammar. To take now a more precise example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se formal <strong>in</strong>vestigations,<br />

let us imag<strong>in</strong>e that <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> grammar are restricted by <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g: 'if<br />

x -+ y is a rule <strong>of</strong> grammar, <strong>the</strong>n x is a s<strong>in</strong>gle member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> auxiliary vocabulary,<br />

<strong>and</strong> y is a nonnul segment'.<br />

Let us suppose that <strong>the</strong> items <strong>of</strong> auxiliary vocabulary are termed A, B, C, . <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> items <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term<strong>in</strong>al vocabulary a, b, c, ...; <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> above condition<br />

means that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grammar under consideration such rules as :<br />

AB+a<br />

AB + ac, etc.<br />

are prohibited. For <strong>in</strong> fact, when <strong>the</strong> above condition is applied, two items <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

auxiliary vocabulary cannot st<strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> left <strong>of</strong> +. Similarly, if # st<strong>and</strong>s for<br />

boundary, a rule such as A -+ # is not permitted.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g formal problem can <strong>the</strong>n be tackled : given <strong>the</strong> restrictive<br />

requirements set out above, is it possible, from a grammar observ<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

requirement, to generate 'sentences' with this structure:<br />

or, more generally, with <strong>the</strong> structure:<br />

aaaabbbaaaabbb,<br />

anbmanbm? (1)<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> what might be asked: is it possible from this type <strong>of</strong><br />

grammar (which Chomsky calls conte xt-free grammar) to generate sentences<br />

with <strong>the</strong> structure:<br />

aaaadbbdacadb bdaaaa, (2)<br />

or, more generallly, with <strong>the</strong> structure:<br />

a "zk- Id.. .db"~da"~~a"idb"zd. ..bnzk-zdanzk- i,<br />

where k, n,, nz,. . .nZk- are some arbitrary positive <strong>in</strong>tegers?<br />

Evidently, <strong>the</strong>se are purely formal questions. One <strong>the</strong>orem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formal<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> grammars states that sentences <strong>of</strong> type (2) can be generated by <strong>the</strong><br />

grammar <strong>in</strong> question.<br />

Let us postulate <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g rules :<br />

rule I S + adAda<br />

rule z S +aSa<br />

rule 3 S +aca<br />

rule 4 A + bAb<br />

rule 5 A + bdSdb<br />

Rule z permits <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> segment aSa. Reapplications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

rules successively form segments aaSaa <strong>and</strong> aaaSaaa. By next apply<strong>in</strong>g rule I,<br />

<strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g segment is formed:<br />

aaaadArlaaa or ddAda4.<br />

Go<strong>in</strong>g on now to apply rules 4, 5 <strong>and</strong> 3 <strong>the</strong> desired segment is obta<strong>in</strong>ed:<br />

a4dbzdacadbzda4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!