Main trends of research in the social and human ... - unesdoc - Unesco

804 Eric Trist
6. BOULDING, K., ‘Dare We Take the Social Sciences Seriously?’, American Psychologist
22 (11), 1967.
7. BRAYFIELD, A. H., ‘Inquiry on Federally Sponsored Research’, American Psychologist
22 (11), 1967.
8. CHERNS, A. B., ‘The Use of the Useful‘, Social Science Research Council Newsletter
3, London, W.C.1, State House, High Holborn, 1968.
9. CLARK, K. E., America’s Psychologists, Washington (D.C.), American Psychological
Association, 1957.
IO. COLM, G., [Contribution to the] Twentieth Anniversary of the Employment Act of
1946: an Economic Symposium, Washington (D.C.), u.s.G.P.o., 1966.
11. DUNHAM, R. E. and P. S. WRIGHT, Teaching Faculty in Higher Education, 1962-
63, Washington (D.C.), Office of Education, 1964 (Circular no. 733).
12. ELLIS, W. W., ‘The Federal Government in Behavioral Science’, American Behavioral
Scientist 7 (9), 1964.
I 3. Russell Sage Foundation, Foundation Directory, New York, The Foundation
Center, Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.
14. Government Operations: Committee on, Research and Technical Sub-committee,
The Use of Social Research in Federal Domestic Programs, Washington (D.C.),
u.s.G.P.o., 1967, 4 vol.
I 5. HARRIS, F. R., ‘National Social Science Foundation: Proposed Congressional
Mandate’, American Psychologist 22 (I I), 1967.
16. HAWORTH, L. J., ‘National Foundation for the Social Sciences’, in: Hearings on
S. 836, Washington (D.C.), u.s.G.P.o., 1967.
17. HORNIG, D. F., Challenges before the Behavioral Sciences, Washington (D.C.),
American Psychological Association, 1965.
18. HUGHES, T. L., ‘National Foundation for the Social Sciences’, in: Hearings on
S. 836, Washington (D.C.), u.s.G.P.o., 1967.
19. KOPKIND, A., ‘The Future-Planners’, American Psychologist 22 (I I), 1967.
20. KROEBER, A., Anthropology Today, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1953.
21. MICHAEL, D. N., ‘Social Engineering and the Future Environment’, American
Psychologist 22 (11), 1967.
22. MONDALE, W. F., ‘Some Thoughts on “Stumbling into the Future”, American
Psychologist 22 (11), 1967.
23. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Social Science
Research Council, The Behavioral and SocialSciences: Outlook and Needs, Englewood
Cliffs (N.J.), Prentice-Hall, 1969.
24. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Foreign Area Research :
A Conference Report, Washington (D.C.), NAS~NRC, 1967.
25. National Science Foundation, Federal Funds for Research, Development and
Other Activities, vols. 10-15, Washington (D.C.), N.s.F., 1962-1967.
26. Office of Science and Technology, Privacy and Behavioral Research, Washington
(D.C.), o.s.T., 1967.
27. PIFER, A., The Non-Government Organization at Bay, New York, Carnegie Corporation,
1966.
28. RIECKEN, H. W., ‘Survey of the Behavioral Sciences’, Items (Social Science
Research Council) 20 (4). 1966.
29. SIMON, H. A., ‘National Foundation for the Social Sciences’, in: Hearings on S.
836, Washington (D.C.), u.s.G.P.o., 1967.
30. Sub-committee on Economics in Government, The Planning-Programming-
Budgeting System: Progress and Potentials, Washington (D.C.), u.s.G.P.O., 1967.
31. UNESCO, National Science Policies of the U.S.A., ‘Science Policy Studies and
Documents’, No. IO, Paris, UNESCO, 1968.
32. United States Senate, Ninetieth Congress, National Foundation for the Social
Sciences Act of 1966 (S. 836).
33. United States Senate, Ninetieth Congress, Full Opportunity and Social Accounting
Act (S. 8431, Washington (D.C.), u.s.G.P.o., 1967.