23.12.2012 Views

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Piercing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fog</strong><br />

number of airfields and <strong>the</strong> lack of logistical support limited <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

Allied aircraft in <strong>the</strong> forward combat area. Compounding this numerical<br />

disadvantage was a command structure that, by fragmenting available air assets,<br />

allowed <strong>the</strong> Lufhyuffe to maintain air superiority.<br />

Operational and logistical planning for TORCH had been predicated on a<br />

quick rush into Tunisia and an early end to <strong>the</strong> campaign. By November 28 <strong>the</strong><br />

drive into Tunisia had stalled, and Allied forces withdrew to Algeria to regroup.<br />

Many factors contributed to <strong>the</strong> failure to take Tunisia. From an intelligence<br />

perspective, certainly <strong>the</strong> most significant was <strong>the</strong> failure to foresee <strong>the</strong> extent<br />

and rapidity of <strong>the</strong> GAF’s response. According to Lt. Gen. Kenneth Anderson,<br />

commander of <strong>the</strong> British First Army which had spearheaded <strong>the</strong> move<br />

eastward, it was <strong>the</strong> GAF that had been <strong>the</strong> decisive factor in bogging down <strong>the</strong><br />

advance.”’<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>y would attempt several abortive offensives in December, for<br />

all practical purposes <strong>the</strong> Allied forces would spend from December 1942<br />

through <strong>the</strong> end of January 1943 establishing <strong>the</strong> logistical infrastructure<br />

necessary for sustained operations and implementing a series of reorganizations<br />

that would eventually provide <strong>the</strong> framework for success in North Africa and<br />

subsequently in western Europe. From <strong>the</strong>se exertions came two milestones in<br />

<strong>the</strong> history of air power: <strong>the</strong> development of organizational structures to permit<br />

<strong>the</strong> effective employment of air assets within a <strong>the</strong>ater as well as <strong>the</strong> more<br />

specific control of air-ground operations, and an expanded role for air power,<br />

particularly strategic air forces.<br />

The evolution of Allied air organization in <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean <strong>the</strong>ater was<br />

a convoluted process that extended over a period of several months, and itself<br />

<strong>the</strong> subject of many studies. During <strong>the</strong> execution of TORCH, Allied air forces<br />

operated as two separate organizations with geographically determined<br />

responsibilities: <strong>the</strong> British Eastern <strong>Air</strong> Command in eastern Algeria and <strong>the</strong><br />

American Twelfth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> in Morocco and in western Algiers. With <strong>the</strong> shift<br />

of Twelfth <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> eastward to support ground operations, this arrangement<br />

became increasingly unwieldy. Through a series of gradual steps in <strong>the</strong> winter<br />

of 1942-1943, <strong>Air</strong> Marshal Arthur Tedder emerged as <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ater air commander<br />

in charge of Mediterranean <strong>Air</strong> Command (MAC). Subordinate to MAC<br />

were NAAF, Malta <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>, and Eastern <strong>Air</strong> Command (Cairo). From <strong>the</strong><br />

standpoint of air operations in North Africa in 1942-1943, <strong>the</strong> pivotal step was<br />

<strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong> NAAF under command of Maj. Gen. Carl Spaatz in February<br />

1943. Under this arrangement, <strong>the</strong> subordinate Northwest African Strategic <strong>Air</strong><br />

<strong>Force</strong> (NASAF), Northwest African Tactical <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> (NATAF), and<br />

Northwest African Coastal <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> (NACAF) focused on functional ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than on geographically oriented missions.* Responsibility for <strong>the</strong> air defense of<br />

*NATAF, composed of RAF 242 Group and U.S. XI1 <strong>Air</strong> Support Command,<br />

was committed to <strong>the</strong> direct support of Allied land forces. NASAF, commanded by<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!