23.12.2012 Views

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Early Intelligence Organization<br />

extensive offensive air strikes could be implemented, by November 1918 <strong>the</strong><br />

AEF had developed target folders on such systems as railroad stations and<br />

switching yards, manufacturing plants, and billeting areas and supply dumps in<br />

Germany. Compilation and distribution of this information was primarily <strong>the</strong><br />

responsibility of <strong>the</strong> Bomb Target Section, which also monitored <strong>the</strong> results of<br />

Allied and American bombing attacks and <strong>the</strong> location of enemy barrage<br />

balloons, AA batteries, and searchlights. Some of <strong>the</strong> section’s work was quite<br />

sophisticated. Referring to an analysis of railroad systems behind enemy lines,<br />

for example, its report noted: “Narrow-gauge roads, main lines and railway<br />

centers were observed, to determine at which points [<strong>the</strong>] most damage could<br />

be done. Photographs were taken, maps made and statistics compiled on <strong>the</strong><br />

amount and importance of traffic going through various centers. When<br />

complete, this information was sent to operations officers . . . and after <strong>the</strong>y had<br />

made <strong>the</strong>ir decisions, maps and photographs of <strong>the</strong> targets decided upon were<br />

sent to <strong>the</strong> bombing squadrons which were to carry out <strong>the</strong> raids.”lX In sum, by<br />

<strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> war airmen could see a requirement for intelligence to contribute<br />

to <strong>the</strong> effective preparation and conduct of air operations that might or might<br />

not be immediately tied to ground force activities.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Intelligence in <strong>the</strong> 1920s<br />

For <strong>the</strong> postwar <strong>Air</strong> Service, <strong>the</strong> organizational struggles over responsibility for<br />

air intelligence began with <strong>the</strong> Army Reorganization Act of 1920. This<br />

legislation generally reflected <strong>the</strong> desire of General Pershing, who had become<br />

Chief of Staff in 1919, to organize U.S. Army headquarters in Washington<br />

along <strong>the</strong> lines of <strong>the</strong> wartime AEF. The WDGS now included five divisions:<br />

Personnel (G-l), Military Intelligence (G-2), Operations and Training (G-3),<br />

Supply (G-4), and War Plans. Theoretically coequal, <strong>the</strong> chiefs of all <strong>the</strong> offices<br />

were brigadier generals, except for <strong>the</strong> G-2 who was generally a colonel.<br />

The duties of <strong>the</strong> Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence (G-2), included <strong>the</strong><br />

requirement to support <strong>the</strong> War Plans Division (WPD) in strategic planning and<br />

to provide War Department intelligence to field commanders at <strong>the</strong> outbreak of<br />

hostilities. In postwar reductions, <strong>the</strong> MID of G-2 was cut to 25 officers and 52<br />

civilians by 1924, where it would remain until modestly increased in 1940. The<br />

number of military and assistant military attaches dropped drastically from a<br />

high of 94 in November 1918. In spite of <strong>the</strong> rapid expansion and growth of<br />

aviation, <strong>the</strong> War Department usually authorized <strong>Air</strong> Service officers as<br />

assistant military attach& only in London, Paris, and Rome.”<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> Corps Act of 1926 provided additional representation for air<br />

matters on <strong>the</strong> WDGS. A new G-2 <strong>Air</strong> Section (shortly elevated to <strong>the</strong> more<br />

important status of a branch) was responsible for policy matters and questions<br />

pertaining to <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>Air</strong> Corps personnel in combat intelligence, aerial<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!