23.12.2012 Views

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

Piercing the Fog - Air Force Historical Studies Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Piercing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fog</strong><br />

By autumn, it was becoming increasingly obvious that a shortage of fuel<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than a lack of ei<strong>the</strong>r pilots or airplanes was <strong>the</strong> primary factor in<br />

restricting <strong>the</strong> Lufhyuffe’s operations. On September 2, Jugdkorps ZZ, which<br />

supported German armies in <strong>the</strong> west, reported 285 serviceable aircraft, but it<br />

added that two groups could not fly that day “owing to lack of fuel.” That <strong>the</strong>se<br />

units were now operating on airfields in Germany suggested that fuel shortages<br />

were systemwide and not merely <strong>the</strong> result of transportation dislocations in<br />

forward area^.'^' Supporting functions suffered even more drastically. The<br />

director of one of <strong>the</strong> GAF’s technical armament branches announced in<br />

October, “All aircraft dry and no testing or ferrying possible.””’ According to<br />

a USSTAF-directed study on ULTRA and American air operations, from<br />

September onward “<strong>the</strong> files . . . become an almost continuous chronicle of oil<br />

shortage e~erywhere.”’~~ Still, it must have been particularly satisfying for those<br />

who put forward <strong>the</strong> oil plan to read a message of November 18 announcing<br />

orders, probably from Goering: “Operations are to be ruthlessly cut down, i.e.,<br />

operations must only take place when <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>r situation and o<strong>the</strong>r prerequisites<br />

guarantee promise of success.”’u In <strong>the</strong> face of such evidence, <strong>the</strong>re could<br />

be little doubt in <strong>the</strong> air commanders’ minds of oil’s continued priority.<br />

Well before ULTRA began to provide information on <strong>the</strong> effects of oil<br />

shortages on <strong>the</strong> Lufhyuffe, Spaatz had shifted <strong>the</strong> focus of American strategic<br />

bombing from <strong>the</strong> German aircraft industry and <strong>the</strong> GAF itself. In response to<br />

those who had cautioned against too hasty a de-emphasis on <strong>the</strong> GAF, <strong>the</strong><br />

commanding general declared in April 1944, “The requisite intensity of<br />

Counter-<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> actions . . . must now be judged by <strong>the</strong> principal <strong>Air</strong><br />

Commanders Relying largely on ULTRA decrypts, Spaatz advised his<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> commanders on September 1 that, except for jet production<br />

installations, <strong>the</strong> German aircraft industry was not a priority target because <strong>the</strong><br />

lack of fuel and qualified pilots, not airframes, was what was hindering German<br />

air operation^."^ ULTRA and o<strong>the</strong>r sources certainly supported this confidence,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> condition of <strong>the</strong> GAF was evident from its relative inactivity as well.<br />

Spaatz and his senior officers did not need special intelligence to tell <strong>the</strong>m a<br />

force that refused to seriously contest attacks on its homeland was a force in<br />

trouble. In a letter to Arnold a month after OVERLORD, Spaatz commented on<br />

“<strong>the</strong> latent weakness of <strong>the</strong> German <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>,” observing, “It even appears that<br />

<strong>the</strong> effectiveness of POINTBLANK was greater than we had anti~ipated.”~~’<br />

Intelligence assessments from a variety of agencies through <strong>the</strong> fall of 1944<br />

continued to confirm this assessment. In October, <strong>the</strong> EOU noted an increase in<br />

<strong>the</strong> production of single-engine fighters from between 500 and 600 a month<br />

earlier in <strong>the</strong> year to 1,400 a month. The economic analysts argued that nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

production nor first-line strength was critical. Because petroleum shortages<br />

affected both operations and training, without which <strong>the</strong> expanding fleet would<br />

be impotent, <strong>the</strong> heavy bombers should continue to concentrate on oil. Fighter<br />

and fighter-bomber attacks on training bases continued to contribute to <strong>the</strong><br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!