09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

organizational distribution of the equipments, and the size of<br />

the MOS and relative percentages of soldiers across the grade<br />

levels. Overall, MOS restructuring can be summarized as a<br />

complex, multi-dimensional decision. The considerations, and<br />

constraints versus requirements, relate to at least training<br />

impacts, personnel characteristics, force structure, equipment<br />

design, personnel resources, manpower resources, and task<br />

structure.<br />

As noted above, the program objective is to develop aids to<br />

facilitate MOS and CMF restructuring decisions regarding such<br />

questions as: Is restructuring needed at all? Should a new MOS<br />

be created? Should MOSS be merged? Is an overall redesign of<br />

the branch MOSS and CMFs needed? Whatever is done impacts<br />

directly on the branch training system design. The addition or<br />

deletion of tasks which require training imposes a requirement to<br />

modify the training system to accomodate those changes.<br />

Program Overview<br />

The current formulation of the program is presented Figure<br />

1. Work has been accomplished or is projected for the near<br />

future on: The Army Authorization Domentation System (TAADS) (a<br />

manpower data base), and personnel and training data bases; the<br />

ability, equipment, and task domains; and trade-off algorithms.<br />

Recent.accomplishments with respect to the TAADS data base, and<br />

the ability and equipment domains will be described in the next<br />

section.<br />

As depicted in Figure 1, the intent is to provide the<br />

analyst with the tools needed to identify desireable MOS<br />

restructuring possibilities, and to consider these withing<br />

manpower, personnel, and training resource constraints: and then<br />

to provide the means to do tradeoffs between the alternatives<br />

with respect to manpower, personnel, and training impacts. In<br />

Figure 1, under "Trade-Off Algorithms", both operations-based and<br />

requirements-based are noted. Operations-based analyses are<br />

those performed, in the Army, by the Personnel Proponent as the<br />

basis for preparing the paperwork which will actually cause a MOS<br />

restructure action to be implemented. These analyses are<br />

sometimes triggered by the outcomes of requirements-based<br />

analyses. Requirements-based analyses often take place when<br />

there is a major change in equipment inventories, doctrine,<br />

organization, or force structure. These requirements-based<br />

analyses tend to be performed by the combat developers in<br />

coordination with the training developers and personnel<br />

proponents.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!