09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

must be accomplished with great care. In a classroom, there is<br />

usually an alert and experienced teacher to compensate for<br />

unclear or inadequate instructional presentations. In a computer<br />

setting, it is essential that the initial instructional be clear:<br />

otherwise, the instruction is likely to fail. Courseware is<br />

computer software that is designed for instructional purposes.<br />

Courseware that is not carefully designed is most likely to be<br />

expensive and ineffective (Jonassen, 1988). As a consequence, to<br />

make optimal use of CBI it will be necessary to develop<br />

techniques for evaluating the success and efficiency of various<br />

ISD methodologies applied in computer-based settings.<br />

Problem<br />

CBI has proven to be an appropriate instructional solution<br />

in many settings (Hannafin and Peck, 1988). CBI has also proven<br />

to be expensive and often ineffective (MacKnight 61 Balagopalan,<br />

1989). What is needed, then, is a means to insure that CBI<br />

course designs are effective and produced in a cost-effective<br />

manner.<br />

There are two aggravating factors to this problem: 1) It is<br />

often true that courseware developers have had no special<br />

training in computer-based methodologies, and 2) It is not<br />

completely clear what cognitive aspects of learning are best<br />

instructed using various computer-based methodologies. In short,<br />

in determining how to optimize CBI developments it will be<br />

necessary to determine how novice and experienced CBI developers<br />

interact with the courseware authoring environment, and it will<br />

also be necessary to evaluate the success of the resulting<br />

courseware.<br />

The methodology proposed below represents an attempt to<br />

build an initial model of CBI authoring that can eventually be<br />

used as a predictor of success when combining particular<br />

courseware authoring environments, CBI developers, subject<br />

matter, and student populations. The Air Force Human Resources<br />

Laboratory (AFHRL) is interested in refining this model in order<br />

to evaluate the usability of transaction shells (Merrill, Li, &<br />

Jones, 1990) in the Advanced Instructional Design Advisor (AIDA),<br />

an automated and integrated set of tools to facilitate and guide<br />

the process of developing effective courseware (Muraida t<br />

Spector, 1990).<br />

The AIDA project focuses on the design and development of<br />

CBI (Spector, 1990). It is assumed that the Air Force will<br />

continue to expand its use of CBI, that the Air Force will<br />

continue to experience a shortage of courseware authors with<br />

backgrounds in instructional technology, and that the subject<br />

matter of immediate interest is maintenance training for<br />

apprentice level maintenance personnel.<br />

To provide CBI design guidance consistent with these<br />

assumptions, AFHRL has decided to pursue the use of intelligent<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!