09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sensitivity to experimental effects, a z score was calculated<br />

since it reflected both the magnitude and variability of measured<br />

effects.<br />

RESULTS<br />

At 550 m + 22OC, performance rates were greatest for the<br />

automated NC task since P-NC task was 87% of C-NC (See Table I).<br />

Task definikiuil for the C-NC task was also better than its ImnUal<br />

counterpart. The reliability of administrations during the<br />

experimental and control conditions was greatest for the C-NC<br />

task. The C-NC version of the NC task was also more sensitive to<br />

altitude effects than the manual version of this performance task<br />

as inferred from z score magnitudes.<br />

TAB’-’ . ; i Prhrzrties of the paper-and-pencil (P-NC) and<br />

automatea (C-NC) versions of the Number Comparison Task<br />

at 550 m + 22OC and 4700 m + 15OC.<br />

CRITERION<br />

Baseline Rates<br />

(correct/min)<br />

Minutes Practice Required<br />

(mln/admin)<br />

Task Definition<br />

(admin 5 and 6)<br />

i<br />

STATISTIC I P-NC : C-NC<br />

8<br />

BASELINE VALUES (550 m + 22OC)<br />

Mean 25.13 28.78<br />

Sigma 8.02 8.88<br />

Mean 20 20<br />

Pearson’s r .89 .94<br />

Reliability Pearson’s r -81 . 91<br />

(550 m vs. 4700 m)<br />

ALTITUDE + COLD EFFECTS (4700 m + 17OC)<br />

Altitude Effect Mean - 5.04 - 5.26<br />

(change In correct/min) Sigma 5.08 4.07<br />

z score - -99 - 1.29<br />

336<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!