I__. - International Military Testing Association

72E
31c
31L
31M
31M COMM
RATER 1 1
RATER 2 7
RATER 3 1
RATER 4 8
RATER 5 1
RATER 6 8
RATER 7 5
FINAL 0.090452
31c COMM
RATER 1 1
RATER 2 1
RATER 3 2
RATER 4 2
RATER 5 4
RATER 6 3
RATER 7 1
RATER 8 1
RATER 9 1
RATER 10 3
RATER 11 6
FINAL 0.445887
GROUP A
0.324852
0.333605
0.242180
0.090452
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
CON
3
3
5
4
3 f.
7
6
REA
2
5
3
2
4
5
7
SPLD
7
8
1
1
6
4
2
PER-V
8
1
7
5
2
1
3
GROUP B
0.343915
0.445887
0.124285
0.286190
PER-A
5
2
6
3
5
6
1
PSY GRMO
4 6
6 . .4
4 8
6 7
8 7
2 3
4 8
CON REA SPLD PER-V PER-A PSY GRMO
6 4 2 5 3 7 8
7 5 3 6 4 2 8
4 8 7 3 5 1 6
4 6 3 5 1 7 8
3 7 8 5 1 2 6
7 8 5 6 1 2 4
6 7 5 3 2 4 8
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
3 5 4 7 2 6 8
4 8 5 7 1 2 6
4 7 3 8 1 2 5
Correlation analyses between each pair of the four MOSS were
conducted using the'MOS mean of each of the 50 abilities. Ratings
for Group A and B had been combined for this analysis. Results
are shown in table 3.
TABLE 3
CORRELATION MATRIX
72E 31c 31L 31M
72E - .7830 .0862 .5782
31c - - .0824 .5527
31L - .1280
31M
Statistical analyses of mean differences between MOSS by ability
and ability cluster have not been conducted, but visual
examination indicate that differences do exists both at the
ability and cluster level as depicted in figures 5 and 6 (pg.5).
100
.