09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

--<br />

of the results occurred at the SL level of breaks. Seldom would<br />

one find all SM-SL links within a platoon equally rated.<br />

Therefore, taking an average SM-SL cohesion rating for the three<br />

squads within a platoon moderated particularly strong or weak<br />

links. A break at the SM-SL level would meet the z 5 -.5<br />

criterion only if one or more of the SM-SL links were extremely<br />

weak. Nevertheless, good links in other squads could compensate<br />

and result in the platoon having acceptable performance. This,<br />

and other explanations are being studied.<br />

Examination of Figure 2 reveals additional findings.<br />

Generally, the fewer cohesion breaks there are, the better the<br />

performance with performance being best when there are no<br />

cohesion breaks at all. Performance is maintained at an average<br />

level with one or two breaks. Additional breaks in cohesion<br />

correspond to less than average performance.<br />

In summary, while a causal relationship can not be inferred,<br />

it appears that the strength of vertical cohesion as measured<br />

prior to engagement is a good predictor of platoon performance at<br />

a Combat Training Center. Vertical cohesion appears most<br />

important to platoon performance at the top platoon leadership<br />

levels, that of PS and PL. Where cohesion breaks at this level,<br />

performance tends to be less effective. However, when vertical<br />

cohesion is strong (that is, when subordinates see their<br />

superiors at taking care of them and being skilled), performance<br />

is strong. These findings are important because they<br />

quantitatively confirm "common lore"; they suggest the cohesive<br />

strength of a chain can be measured, and they indicate that the<br />

success of any efforts to increase or maintain the strength of<br />

vertical cohesion in a platoon focused chain of command can be<br />

assessed against a clear criterion measure.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Siebold G.L. and Kelly, D.R. (1988a) The impact of cohesion on<br />

platoon performance at the Joint Readiness Training Center.<br />

Technical Report 812. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research<br />

Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. ADA<br />

202926.<br />

Siebold, G.L; and Kelly, D.R. (1988b) A measure of Cohesion which<br />

predicts unit performance and ability to withstand stress.<br />

Proceedinss: Sixth Users' Workshop on Combat Stress, San<br />

Antonio, TX, 30 Nov-4 Dee 1987. Consultation Report 88-003.<br />

Fort Sam Houston, TX: Health Care studies and Clinical<br />

Investigation Activity, Health Services Command.<br />

437

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!