09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After the new construct structure was delineated, each PEC item was assigned to a construct/scale<br />

according to its factor loadings and item content. Items that did not fit well into any construct were<br />

placed in a “Miscellaneous” category. Item-total correlations were then computed for these revised construct<br />

scales, and these were used to help guide decisions concerning which items to retain m the final<br />

(shortened) PEC.<br />

The final step in the present research was to shorten and refine the PEC. Decisions concerning<br />

which items to drop took into account the pilot test results, the comparison sample results, the retranslation<br />

results, and the item content. A few promising items were retained that did not fit welI into any of<br />

the predictor constructs and placed in a “Miscellaneous” category. A total of thirty-two content scale<br />

items were dropped. In addition, several of the Unlikely Virtues scale items were revised or replaced<br />

based on results from the comparison and pilot sample data analyses.<br />

The final (shortened) version of the PEC contains 116 items distributed across the final construct<br />

scales as shown in Table 1, Table 1 also presents descriptive statistics for these scales. All of the scales<br />

except Dependability have very good internal consistency reliability. The internal consistency of the<br />

Dependability scale is comparatively low, and the mean score on this scale is also quite high in the applicant<br />

sample. This scale was retained for further study in spite of these problems because, based on the<br />

literature review, it is expected to predict attrition. Descriptive statistics are not reported on Table 1 for<br />

the final Unlikely Virtues scale, because this scale contains new and revised items. Table 2 presents the<br />

intercorn3lations among these final construct scale scores.<br />

Achievement Motivation (AM)<br />

Table 2<br />

Scale Intercorrelations for the Final (Shortened) PEC Scales<br />

Dependability (DP) .56<br />

Social Comfort (SC) .32 .I8<br />

Dominance (DM) .42 .29 .47<br />

AM DP SC DM LO NR OP<br />

Leadership Orientation (LO) A4 .28 .42 .56<br />

NROTC/<strong>Military</strong> Interest and Motivation (NR) .42 .35 .25 .33 .31<br />

Organization and Planning (OP) -58 -42 .19 .27 .31 .34<br />

Unlikely Virtues (XIV) l .45 .30 .25 .33 .25 .35 .33<br />

NOW Ns range from 962 to 964.<br />

l Sum of 7 idned items.<br />

502

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!