09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tosunmmrize, informationgeneratedfrranthesecondmodule includedthe<br />

identificationoftasksperfoxmdby incmbents intheirpresentjobandtime<br />

ratingdata foreachtask. !Iheprqzmalsocollectsdataontheammntof<br />

t~~inus~thenrodule,hcrwroaniytimesan~tbacked~and<br />

changeda-, andhcwmanyerror messageswerewrittmtothescrem.<br />

Alldatawerewrittenouttodata filesamlcapbredon floppy disk.<br />

F&sear&Design<br />

Ihetwotieper&ntvariableswereformandsquence: thetwofomswere<br />

paper/pencil (P) and amputer-based (C); and the three types of sequence<br />

were: (1) P f011Wed by P, (2) P follmed by c, and (3) c follcweq by P. _.<br />

(Note: Although a fcurth variation of C folluwed by C would have been<br />

desirable, it was a condition of using this population that all persms had<br />

totakeapaper/pencilsumey.. Wejudgedthataskingairm2ntotakethesame<br />

~~~~~timeswouldaffectreliabilityofthedata.)<br />

Test/m-testplxlc&WS were used for cmparing the two survey<br />

achninistrationsandeachrespondentservedashisorher~control. tis<br />

wasnecessaryasno~ioncauldbemadeabcortthecentrdl~~and<br />

dispersion of scorn. EachresporxBnthadauniquepatternofresponseswhi~<br />

describeiihisorherjob.<br />

me three trehnents were:<br />

Time 1 (Tl)<br />

Treatment #l..... P follWe5 by P (P-P)<br />

Treatment #2..... P II 11 c (P-c)<br />

Treatment #3..... c II 81 P (C-P)<br />

~hne2 (T2) Oric&alN<br />

Inte.n~ofelapsedtimebetweenadmini&mtions, anumbrof factorswere<br />

considered. A reviewoftheliteraturegenerallysupportedthedecisionthat<br />

alapseoftwotofaurweeksbetweentimeoneandtime~wlouldbe<br />

acceptable.<br />

!I~E purpcse of treatment #I (P-P) was to prwvide a baseline against whiti<br />

theather~~~~dbeccanparedwithrespecttothevariabilityof<br />

i3?st/re-test. Althcughaperfectmatiwasnotexpected,areasonablyhigh<br />

matchwas anticipated, as jobs seldmchangemch intwoweeks.<br />

~eP-Can;iC-P~~~prwidedccsnparisondatato examine effects due<br />

to form of administration. For exanp?le, the second survey might yield a<br />

hi~~nwlberoftaskssel~thanthefirst,sincethefirstacbninistration<br />

might sensitize imumbents to the nature of their jobs. However, this effect<br />

couldbecon.fouMed fortheP-CandC-Psequ~because itispossiblethat<br />

allCadmini&rationswouldyieldahighern~~b~rof responsesbecaUseC<br />

mspoMentswereforcedtolookateach separatetask,whereaSwiththepaper<br />

versiontheymightaccidentallysmnpasta relevanttasksta~t.<br />

2Mministration and Data Collection<br />

AboutMay24, the traditional P.suveywasdispat&edAirFo rce-wide by<br />

CMSQusingtraditionalmxms andmethodsofdistribution. The first<br />

71<br />

40<br />

20<br />

21<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!