09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The final analysis looked at the utility of the<br />

scoring keys as defined as a reduced risk of:<br />

(a) having a security clearance denied to an individual<br />

who has been assigned to a sensitive duty position<br />

and (b) assigning unreliable individuals to sensitive<br />

duty positions. The utility was evaluated by first<br />

establishing cutoff scores and then determining what<br />

the impact would have been if the empirical keys and<br />

cutoff scores had been used in prescreening.<br />

The goal, in setting the cutoff scores, was to<br />

screen out individuals with low scores on the empirical<br />

keys and yet fulfill existing manpower requirements. In<br />

this sample, 19% of the non-prior service male<br />

applicants were rejected in the prescreening<br />

adjudication phase. Thus, cutoff scores were<br />

established for the three scoring keys at the point<br />

closest to the 19%/81% split. 2<br />

Empirical<br />

Scorinq Key<br />

Prescreening<br />

Adjudication<br />

score<br />

Below<br />

cutoff<br />

Issue Case Status Below<br />

cutoff<br />

Type of Discharge<br />

Regression model<br />

with Type of<br />

Discharge<br />

Below<br />

cutoff<br />

Above<br />

cutoff<br />

Below<br />

cutoff<br />

Above<br />

cutoff<br />

Table2<br />

impact of Using Cutoff Scores on the Issue Case<br />

and Unsuitability Dkharge Rates<br />

Table 2 shows the impact of using the three keys<br />

in terms of reducing the issue case and unsuitability<br />

discharge rates. The base rate for issue cases in this<br />

sample was 8.0% The percentages of issue cases<br />

above the cutoff was lower than the base rate for all<br />

three keys, with the issue case status key showing the<br />

lowest percentage (5.3%). Thus, the issue case rate<br />

could be reduced by approximately three percentage<br />

points by using this key. Analysis of DCII data<br />

revealed that 289 of the non-prior service males who<br />

entered high security occupations in the Army in 1984<br />

became classified as issue cases. Thus, approximately<br />

98 of these individuals would not have been allowed<br />

into high security occupations if the issue case status<br />

scoring key and its cutoff had been used for<br />

prescreening.<br />

Issue Case Status Tvoe of Discharqe<br />

Percent Percent Percent Percent<br />

w No Issue Unsuitable Normal<br />

25.9 74.1 11.5 88.5<br />

5.6 94.4 14.0 86.0<br />

22.2 77.8 9.4 90.6<br />

5.3 94.7 14.5 85.5<br />

16.1 83.9 24.4 75.6<br />

6.7 93.3 11.7 88.3<br />

28.0 72.0<br />

10.4 89.6<br />

Base Rate 8.0 92.0 13.5 86.5<br />

514

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!