09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As shown in Table 1 the supervisors and managers assessed each of the specific changes<br />

favorably. For example, they agreed that the elimination Of mandatory interviews is easy to<br />

carry out, results in fair selection of candidates, and results in positions being rapidly filled.<br />

Similarly, the supervisors and managers perceived benefits resulting from the combined changes<br />

(e.g., perceived increases in their authority to influence classification decisions, the overall<br />

productivity of the work teams). They did not perceive differences with respect to meeting job<br />

responsibilities or filling positions as a result of the inception of these changes. Finally,<br />

concerning the institutionalization of the changes, managers and supervisors are positive about<br />

these changes, prefer the new system over the old, and would like to see the changes continued<br />

in their work setting.<br />

I<br />

B1.12’<br />

I<br />

Blmlmtlon ot<br />

I<br />

M8nd8lofy hl-<br />

,<br />

I<br />

- - - -.--,-------------------l9*.11*<br />

(rJq<br />

Fieure 2. Model of acceptance based on path analyses.<br />

A path analysis was applied to determine the correspondence between the data and the<br />

proposed model as described in Figure 1. The results of the path analysis are presented in<br />

Figure 2 and the correlation matrix underlying the analysis are presented in Table 2. The<br />

ordering of the variables and their interrelationships as presented in Figure 2 generally<br />

correspond to the structure of the proposed model. As hypothesized the LEVEL variable is most<br />

strongly related to CLIMATE which in turn directly influences the three changes. Assessment of<br />

the three changes has a significant relationship on CONSEQUENCES BENEFITS but not on<br />

CONSEQUENCES EFFORT. The differentiation of consequences into two types was made on the<br />

basis of a factor analysis which generated two independent factors. Both sets of consequences<br />

are significantly related to ACCEPTANCE OF THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE CHANGES with the<br />

CONSEQUENCES BENEFITS clearly the strongest predictor. The model accounted for a good<br />

amount of the total variance (R2 =.56). In addition to the absence of a significant relationship<br />

between the specific changes and the CONSEQUENCES EFFORT variable, the ordering of effects<br />

that were obtained for ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY INTERVIEWS departed from the proposed<br />

model. The direct relationship between this change and acceptance was stronger than the<br />

relationship of this variable to consequences.<br />

477<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!