09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comuarison with “Honest” Sample<br />

The applicant sample generally chose more desirable response options (i.e., response options that led<br />

to higher scores) than the NROTC sample. For most of the PEC items, the difference between the mean<br />

item-level scores for the two groups was quite small. However, for a few items the difference was large,<br />

especially when the “correct” response was fairly obvious. These latter items are probably the most<br />

susceptible to distortion, and this information was considered in deciding which items to drop.<br />

Refining the PEC<br />

The results of the factor analysis and the retranslation exercise were both taken into account in defining<br />

the final set of PEC constructs. Where the retranslation and the factor analysis suggested a slightly<br />

different set of constructs, rational considerations guided formation of the fmal constructs. For example,<br />

although the Responsibility items were grouped with the Achievement LMotivation items in the factor<br />

analysis, the literature review suggested that these two predictor constructs would be rela:ed to somewhat<br />

different criterion constructs. Therefore, Achievement Motivation and Responsibility were kept separate,<br />

Revisions were made to many of the PEC constructs based on the retranslation and the pilot test analyses,<br />

resulting in a final set of seven “revised” biodata/temperament constructs. These revised constructs are<br />

listed on the left side of Table 1,<br />

Achievement Motivation<br />

Dependability<br />

Social Comfort<br />

Dominance<br />

Leadership Orientation<br />

NROTC/<strong>Military</strong> Interest and Motivation<br />

Organization and Planning<br />

Unlikely Virtues<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

Table 1<br />

Descriptive Statistics for the Final (Shortened) PEC Scales<br />

# of Items Mean<br />

.80<br />

1.29<br />

1.02<br />

.87<br />

51<br />

.68<br />

.58<br />

2<br />

.49<br />

.43<br />

.47<br />

A4<br />

.68<br />

.56<br />

.56<br />

23 iii<br />

Standard<br />

Deviation Reliability1<br />

NOIS. NC range from 962 to 964 for means and standard deviations; from 898 to 953 for the reliabilities. (Computation of coefficient alpha<br />

required complete data.)<br />

l Coefficient Alpha<br />

2 Descriptive statistics an not presented for the fiial Unlikely Vhues scale because it contains new items.<br />

3 The Miscellaneous category is not a scale, so descriptive statistics are not appropriate.<br />

501<br />

.82<br />

.59<br />

.73<br />

.82<br />

.78<br />

.73<br />

.80<br />

n/a<br />

n/a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!