09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

__-----,_ __---__.<br />

HUMAN PERFORMANCE DATA FOR COMBAT MODELS<br />

COLLINS, Dennis D., Department of the Army, The Pentagon,<br />

Washington, D. C.<br />

The conceptualization of any modern system requires early<br />

integration with its operational environment. The requirement<br />

for early systems integration is particularly important for<br />

military systems which are unique in that they must function<br />

against an enemy intent on their destruction. Survival in this<br />

environment is frequently the principal mission of the system<br />

and also its principal measure of effectiveness. It is the<br />

analytical merger of the conceptual system with its operational<br />

environment which defines both the objective and importance of<br />

military combat modeling.<br />

Current versions of systems development models are virtually<br />

all computer resident. Because of the complexity of systems<br />

development, plus the requirement for many repetitions modern<br />

combat models are best suited for an automated environment.<br />

Combat models differ from Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided<br />

Manufacturing (CAD/CAM). CAD/CAM is used to conceptualize and<br />

manufacture a specific system. A systems development combat<br />

model, on the other hand, is used to demonstrate a system's<br />

performance in its anticipated wartime environment performing<br />

against its probable enemy. Combat Models are also unique in<br />

that both the system and the wartime environment are required to<br />

be speculative in order to estimate the probable reality at the<br />

time the system will actually perform its battlefield mission.<br />

Modern data systems provide the capability to view systems<br />

,operational performance early in design, allowing elimination of<br />

candidate concepts even before they leave the drawing board.<br />

This relatively new capability to observe ltdraftVt or ltnotionalt'<br />

systems inside a model of an operational environment presents<br />

not only new powers of design, but new problems as well. The<br />

process of systems development from design through testing now<br />

takes place inside a computer. Entire technology options and<br />

systems design concepts can be eliminated long before even<br />

drawings are completed. Traditional human factors engineering<br />

begins when the concept of a system is sufficiently firm to<br />

permit the design of at least a mock up of the man-machine<br />

interface such as a cockpit simulator. The combat model, however,<br />

has allowed the selection of first order military technologies<br />

and systems candidates completely inside the notional<br />

reality of a computer.<br />

Because the systems development combat model grew from<br />

analytical communities which were oriented to tactics and<br />

engineering, the representation of human performance parameters<br />

in the evolution of combat models was rarely considered. The<br />

impact of this evolution has been subtle. By omitting human<br />

414

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!