09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

iors, these items are more likely to be verifiable. Thus, an effort was made to include as many biodata<br />

items as possible in the pilot version of the PEC. However, when sufficient numbers of biodata items<br />

could not be written to adequately cover a construct, temperament items were also included. Between 13<br />

and 21 items’were written to tap each of the eight predictor constructs. In order to detect response distortion<br />

by applicants if it occurs, a ten item response validity scale (called the Unlikely Virtues scale) was<br />

also developed and included in the inventory. Thus, the pilot version of the inventory, called the Profile<br />

of Experiences and Characteristics (PEC), contained 151 items.<br />

Evaluating the PEC<br />

Both rational and empirical approaches were taken in evaluating and refining the PEC. The rational<br />

approach was a retranslation exercise in which researchers independently categorized the PEC items into<br />

the eight biodata/temperament constructs. The empirical approach involved administering the PEC to a<br />

large sample of NROTC applicants. The inventory was also administered to a comparison sample of<br />

NROTC scholarship students.<br />

Retranslation Exercise<br />

The retranslation exercise had two purposes: (1) to determine whether researchers would agree concerning<br />

the placement of items on constructs; and (2) to obtain information that could be used to further<br />

revise and refine the composition of the constructs and their definitions. Seven researchers who were<br />

knowledgeable about biodata and/or personality research were asked to independently sort each of the<br />

PEC items into one of the construct categories according to the perceived match between item and category<br />

content. The degree of agreement among these researchers concerning the placement of items was<br />

then evaluated.<br />

Pilot Test<br />

The PEC was administered to all Board Eligible NROTC applicants who were processed for the<br />

1990 NROTC scholarship program between 18 December 1989 and 30 January 1990 as part of their application<br />

process. Completed PEC inventories were obtained for 972 NROTC applicants from nearly all<br />

of the 41 Navy Recruiting Districts. About 90 percent of the respondents in this pilot test sample were<br />

either 18 or 19 years old, and 91 percent were male.<br />

Frequency counts were conducted to identify and eliminate items where the vast majority of respondents<br />

marked the same response alternative. Next, a rational scoring scheme was developed so that a<br />

preliminary set of item- and scale-level scores could be computed. When cntenon data become available,<br />

this scoring system may need to be modified. The item-level scores that were computed were intercorrelated<br />

and factor analyzed.<br />

Comparison with “Honest” Sample<br />

In order to obtain some base rate information regarding how “honest” respondents (i.e., respondents<br />

who have little to gain by distorting their responses) score on the PEC, a comparison sample of students<br />

already enrolled in the NROTC scholarship program was administered the PEC under instructions to respond<br />

as honestly as possible, A total of 175 first-year NROTC scholarship students from the University<br />

of Minnesota, Notre Dame University, and Carnegie-Mellon University completed the PEC in January<br />

1990. This sample was 93 percent male.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!