I__. - International Military Testing Association

Table 1
Correlation Matrix of Predictors and Criteria
Pass 3 . 76**
Combat . 23**
Two-hand .31**
Criteria
Predictors
Event 3 Pass 3 Combat Two-hand
%
. 12**
. 23** . 34**
Combined .33** . 23** . 68** . 92**
Note. **pc.OOOl. llCombinedlt represents the correlation between
the predictor and the predicted values based on a linear
combination of both predictors.
A second practical concern is the quality of the remaining
recruits to be assigned to the MOS in the 11X series. If all of
the recruits who score high on the additional tests are placed
into one MOS, the remaining MOS will receive less qualified
individuals. It has already been demonstrated that Two-hand
Tracking is as good (if not better) a predictor of TOW gunner
performance as CO. It remains to be shown that selection based
on Two-hand Tracking will lead to less of a decrease in the
quality of the remaining recruits than CO.
Table 2
Predicting Performance on Event 3 Using CO and Two-Hand Tracking
Model R square df F
co . 052 l/909 49.84**
2-Hand
Tracking
co &
a-Hand
Tracking
. 094 l/909 94.06**
. 111 2/908 56.69**
Note -0 **p