09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.<br />

~~whosesuweyswereretumedto~wereiTlanediatelysentasecond<br />

P administration with an explanatory letter. ByJuly 5, 30 secondreturns<br />

were received and used for analysis.<br />

For this research effort, printed swxeys for the P-C -bEnt were handdelivered<br />

to the Survey control Officers ax Bery&rm Kelly, aMI Randolph<br />

?d?E6. !Ihe cmputerized version was then giv& within'2-4 weeks folluihg the<br />

paper administration. For all ccaqxterized administrations, local Z-248<br />

Ew?sonal~(pcs)wereused. Each xxspotient used a separate disk for<br />

taking the sumey. For the C-P treatmsnt a reverse process wasusedstarting<br />

withE&wksandLacklandAFBs. Allpapsrversionsbiemmachine-scannedby<br />

~tocreateadatafileondisk,~~wasthenma~arrdmergedwiththe . .<br />

datastrings collectedviatheFCs.<br />

Results<br />

Any inteqxetationofthedatamsttah intoacccuntthatthe Chapel<br />

Mamgement Specialw, selected forconveniencemaynotbegenemlly<br />

mqmsentative of all Air Fame jobs. Sewti, themmberofairmen forea&<br />

treatment was sndll. CIhhd, there is no "correct" oridedl selection of<br />

eitherjcbtas~ortherelativethespentratings,hence statisticsthat<br />

relyoncentraltendemy cculdnotbeused. Finally, arnmberofmre<br />

qualitative techniques such as "think aloud" protccols or follow-up<br />

questionnairesthatcouldhaveaddmssed sane of the ~issuesraisedby<br />

the5edatawerenotpossible inthegivmthe frame.<br />

Table 1sumnarizesdataintenrksofthetotal numberoftaskssel~by<br />

all individuals for each administration, the mean number of tasks selected by<br />

ea~person,thepercentoftasksselectedinboththefirstandsecond<br />

administrations, andthemeanchange innuinberoftasks selededper<br />

individual.<br />

Table1<br />

summary of TaskSelectionData<br />

N=30 N=17 N=17<br />

Treatment Pl - P2 Pl - C2 Cl - P2<br />

. .<br />

Total tasks select. 3,684 3,878 1,808 1,950 2,418 2,267<br />

Mean each respond. 123 129 106 115 142 133<br />

Selectedbothadm. 81% 82% 75%<br />

-change . +6.5% +8.4% -8.9% .<br />

. Anotherresearchissuewaswhether, forthejobtasksselectedby<br />

InWmbents, theestimatesof"TimeSpentin PresentJob"wouldvaKyasa<br />

function of type of admhhtmtion. (This isestimatedwithaninepoint<br />

scale:l= "VeKy small amount"). Table2showsthechangeinratingsfrm~e<br />

first administration to the secmd where, for example, for the Pl - P2<br />

administration of 2,988 tasks chosen, 1,283 time ratings were the same, 387<br />

taskswereratedonepointhi~~formoretimespent, 342 wereratedorle<br />

Point lower forlesstime spent, etc.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!