09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 Comp!etely satisfactory, somewhat above average, more positive than<br />

negative characteristics;<br />

4 Satisfactory, average, positive and negative characteristics are balanced,<br />

5 Adequate, somewhat below average, more negative than positive<br />

characteristics;<br />

6 Just adequate, clearly below average, more negative than positive<br />

characteristics; _<br />

7 Unsatisfactory, obviously negative, clearly more negative characteristics<br />

than usually expected.<br />

The computer-assisted planning tasks and computer-simulated planning games consist<br />

of a comparable matrix of methods and dimensions, too (Melter & Geilhardt, 1989). As<br />

a rule military raters use the aptitude criteria achievement, social competence and<br />

cooperation, argumentation, planning and decisiveness. These concepts describe a<br />

range of characteristics denotable as leadership in small groups.<br />

The problem of behavior prediction<br />

Now, psychological aptitude researchers and military raters are confronted with the<br />

problem of whether real-life behavior in squads, platoons orcompanies can be predicted<br />

from task-generated behavior in artificial testing conditions.<br />

While the predictor situations are sufficiently described, the criteria referring to careers<br />

and jobs still have to be clarified to solve the prediction problem. Psychological research<br />

normally makes use of analyses of job demands. Such analyses produce the criteria by<br />

which leadership, for example in squads, platoons and companies, can be assessed by<br />

other military personnel (instructors, superiors) and teachers at the officer schools, at<br />

the universities of the German Federal Armed Forces, and in field appointments. If the<br />

predictors and criteria are similar and comparable, the results of such analyses will be<br />

reliable and valid. But if there are great differences between both situations, the<br />

psychological aptitude research unit and the personnel department have to look for the<br />

central personal constructs of the criterion situations. But neither psychologists nor<br />

military users are able to claim td?ave discovered them with hundred per cent reliability.<br />

Use of real-life situations to establish job demands<br />

. One approach to establish career or job demands translatable with psychological<br />

methods in measurements is to issue questionnaires to officers at the officer schools,<br />

the Bundeswehr agencies and in field appointments, In first analyses we used repertory<br />

grid techniques to question 25 military raters and staff officers from the Central<br />

Personnel Office, 17 officers from the Air Force Officer School, and 15 officers from<br />

the Army Officer School about their personal constructs of apt and inapt young officers.<br />

The aim of those studies was to hear the implicit aptitude theories of these officers about<br />

the new officer generation experienced in their own job environment (Mentges, 1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!