09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A further objective was to produce a diagnostic process model fordetermining and<br />

evaluating the aptitude criteria for selecting officer applicants (Behling & Neubauer,<br />

1990). We intend to question officers in the field, too.<br />

The personal constructs are defined in behavioral terms. However, the method does not<br />

allow to work out unambiguously, in which situation the behaviors defined has what<br />

kind of results, success or failure, for the man concerned. Such distinctions are only<br />

possible if we ask about so-called “behavior - situation - results - triangles” in real-life<br />

environments. This means asking about typical situations, about behavior in such<br />

situations and about the effects of this behavior, for example on the soldiers in the squad<br />

entrusted to the officer candidate for the first time in the training unit. I<br />

When asking about typical situations for leadership we have todifferentiate enormously.<br />

Firstly, the size of the military groups (squad, platoon, company) and the responsibilities<br />

increase during someone’s career.<br />

Secondly, typical situations in peace time, in periods of tension, and in war are different.<br />

Thirdly, we have different typical situations indoors and outdoors. Many further<br />

distinctions are imaginable. It is essential for our problem that while leadership in a<br />

small group will result in success, the same behavior might not be successful in a war<br />

situation. In threatening situations where prompt, precise, and right action is necessary,<br />

there is a need for different leadership qualities from those in situations where there is<br />

no stress (Cardoso de Sousa, 1990).<br />

Predictions for normal and dangerous situations<br />

All military experts concerned with such topics assume that they are unable to reliably<br />

predict leadership in war or to predict the character of that type of officer who would<br />

in fact be able to lead successfully in war simply because the speed, variety, and<br />

unforeseeability of events and behaviors in such crucial circumstances are beyond<br />

precise description and simulation (Oetting, 1988).<br />

On the other hand, there is some evidence that people with a certain pattern of basic<br />

abilities will most probably be unable to hold their own in typical situations. For the<br />

moment, we have left out of consideration the fact that a certain pattern of skills and<br />

knowledge can be generated by training and education.<br />

The psychological and medical assessments of such basic patterns conjoined with the<br />

prediction of success in typical situations are difficult enough, but the educational<br />

assessment of the increase achieved by training and education is incomparably more<br />

complicated.<br />

Let us take an example out of the domain of survival, The analyses of reports given by<br />

survivors of accidents have shown that<br />

- their belief in being rescued,<br />

-the fact that they did not panic,<br />

- their good morale, and<br />

-their will to survive,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!