09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Backaround<br />

VALIDATION OF A NAVAL OFFICER SELECTION BOARD<br />

Captain J.P. Bradley<br />

Canadian Forces Personnel Applied Research Unit<br />

Willowdale, Ontario, Canada M2N 6B7<br />

Introduction<br />

In 1976, the Canadian Navy established the Naval Off,icer __<br />

Interview Board (NOIB) for the purpose of selecting applicants for<br />

the Maritime Surface and Sub-surface (MARS), and Maritime Engineer<br />

(MARE) officer occupations. There were two components to the NOIB,<br />

a selection interview,‘ conducted by a panel of senior naval<br />

officers, and an orientation program, consisting of tours of naval<br />

facilities and briefings by naval officers. The purpose of the<br />

orientation component was to ensure that candidates would be able<br />

to make an informed decision to join the Navy if selected by the<br />

NOIB.<br />

By 1983, the NOIB had not reduced attrition among MARS and<br />

MARE trainees; therefore, the Naval Officer Selection Board (NOSB)<br />

was developed. The NOSB retained the orientation component and<br />

interview of the former NOIB but incorporated other assessment<br />

instruments to achieve a multi-method approach to the assessment<br />

of naval officer potential. In 1989, the NOSB was renamed the<br />

Naval Officer Assessment Board (NOAB).<br />

To become qualified MARS officers, candidates must complete<br />

four phases of training; the Basic Officer Training Course (BOTC),<br />

required of all Canadian Forces (CF) officer applicants regardless<br />

of military occupation, and three phases of MARS occupation<br />

qualification training. An evaluation of the NOAB's ability to<br />

predict success on BOTC by Okros, Johnston, and Rodgers (1988)<br />

demonstrated that: (a) the NOAB predicted BOTC performance better<br />

than CF recruiting centre (CFRC) measures; (b) the optimal<br />

combination of predictors produced a multiple correlation of .40;<br />

and (c) the file review was identified as the best single NOAB<br />

predictor of BOTC with a correlation of .31. The present study<br />

complements the BOTC validation study and examines the ability of<br />

the NOAB to predict MARS occupation training success.<br />

Subjects<br />

Method<br />

Of the 743 MARS candidates who have attended the NOAB, the 95<br />

who have gone on to complete all phases of MARS training comprised<br />

the sample for this validation study. The subjects in this study<br />

were male. Female applicants have attended the NOAB since 1988,<br />

but none have completed MARS occupational training to date.<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!