09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

knowledge-based model (equation 3) as a restricted version of the full task identity model<br />

(equation a), the R’ increase associated with the full model may be tested. That test shows<br />

that the R’ difference between these models, .13, is statistically significant: F(267,2258) =<br />

3.1, p c .Ol. However, the skill and knowledge scales model accounts for 80% of the variance<br />

accounted for by the full-task model. Thus, the skill and knowledge model has great<br />

practical value for estimating TDS training time models.<br />

Discussion<br />

The skill-and-knowledge scale model is much more accurate than we expected. Also, it<br />

permits training-time models--learning curves--to be estimated for tasks early in the design<br />

process, and it provides feedback to designers concerning which particular task skill and<br />

knowledge requirements are causing high training times. For these reasons, we believe that<br />

the skill-and-knowledge trainingtime model represents a significant step forward in our<br />

ability to design systems with acceptable training requirements, and to incorporate MPT<br />

considerations into the weapons system design process.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bell, J. & Thomasson, M. (1984). Job Cntecorization Proiect. Randolph AFB, TX: United States Air Force<br />

Occupational Measurement Center.<br />

Christal, R.E., s( Weissmuller, J.J. (1988). Job-task inventory analysis. In S. Gael (Ed), Job Analvsis Handbook<br />

for Business. Industrv. and Government. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (Chapter 9.3).<br />

Gentner, F.C. (1988, December). USAF Model Manpower, Personnel and Training Organization--An Update.<br />

Proceedincs of the 30th Annual Conference of the Militarv Testinu <strong>Association</strong>. Arlington, VA: U. S. Army<br />

Research Institute.<br />

Hayes, W.L. Sr Winkler, R.L. (1971). Statistics: Prohahilitv. Tnference and Decision. New York: Holt, Rinehart<br />

s( Winston.<br />

Lance, C.E., Kavanagh, MJ., Sr Gould, R.B. (1989, August). Development and Convergent Validity of Cross-Job<br />

Movement Indices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological <strong>Association</strong>, New<br />

Orleans, LA.<br />

Mitchell, J.L.; Ruck, H.W.; & Driskill, W.E. (1988). Task-based training program development. In S. Gael (Ed),<br />

Job Annlvsis Handbook for Business. Tndustrv. and Government. New York: John Wiley Sr Sons, Inc.<br />

Perrin, B.M., Knight, J.R., Mitchell, J.L., Vaughan, D.S., & Yadrick, R.M. (1988). Trainine Decisions Svstem:<br />

Develonment of the Task Characteristics Subsvstem (AFHRL-TR-88-15). Brooks AFB, TX: Training Systems<br />

Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.<br />

Ruck, H.W. (1982, February). Research and development of a training decisions system. Proceedinas of the<br />

Societv for Applied Learnine Technoloa. Orlando, FL.<br />

Ruck, H.W., SC Birdlebough, M.W. (1977). An innovation in identifying Air Force quantitative training<br />

requirements. Proceedines of the 19th Annual Conference of the Militarv Testine <strong>Association</strong>. San Antonio, TX:<br />

Air Force Human Resources Laboratory and the USAF Occupational Measurement Center.<br />

Vaughan, D.S.; Mitchell, J.L.; Yadrick, R.M.; Perrin, B.M.; Knight, J.R.; Eschenbrenner, A.J.; Rueter, F.H.; and<br />

Feldsott, S. (1989, June). Research and Develonment of the Trainina Decisions System (AFHRL-TR-88-50).<br />

Brooks AFB, TX: Training Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!