09.12.2012 Views

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

I__. - International Military Testing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Post Selection Board Analysis<br />

Post-selection board review of the 1986/87 NROTC scholarship<br />

year pointed to the need to build more structure into the<br />

evaluation system in order to (1) provide more consistency in<br />

the evaluation of records and (2) permit the selection of those<br />

who were truly best qualified in both an academic and potential<br />

officer sense.<br />

Assessment of the criteria used by board members to assign<br />

points to an application suggested that there was wide variance<br />

among board members in the value placed on the level of a<br />

student's academic or extracurricular performance and the type<br />

of student extracurricular activity. For example, some board<br />

members felt that athletic participation was essential for<br />

success as an officer; others did not. Applications were<br />

scored accordingly, with the resulting selection scores<br />

dependent upon the values of the particular selection board<br />

members assigned to review an application. This created the<br />

potential for wide variance in the scoring of similar<br />

applications by different selection boards.<br />

Analysis of the scores assigned by the weekly boards revealed<br />

that the average score awarded was over 80 points (out of<br />

100). This meant that weekly selection board members had very<br />

little ability to "reach down" to select an applicant who came<br />

to the selection process with a less competitive Quality Index,<br />

regardless of the merit of the applicant.<br />

Solution<br />

To address the problems of evaluation consistency and the<br />

extremely high average selection board score, a more formal<br />

method of application evaluation was instituted. Applicant<br />

evaluation categories were developed from observation of board<br />

member discussion during the initial weekly selection board<br />

sessions. Those areas that selection board members appeared to<br />

value consistently as most important when discriminating<br />

between competitive scholarship applicants were incorporated<br />

into a revised applicant evaluation system. Each evaluation<br />

category was also assigned a scoring level maximum . Optical<br />

Mark Reading (OMR) equipment was purchased and the NROTC<br />

Scholarship application was redesigned to be read by an optical<br />

scanner. Additionally, a formal selection board training<br />

program was developed to ensure that each weekly selection<br />

board began the selection board process with the same<br />

application evaluation guidance.<br />

This revised selection system was finalized during the summer<br />

of 1987 and used by the first weekly selection board of the<br />

1987/1988 NROTC program year. Each year, data based on<br />

selection board actions are reviewed and the system modified as<br />

483

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!