ACTAS DEL CONGRESO CNLSE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PONENCIAS Y COMUNICACIONES DEL CONGRESO CNLSE SOBRE ADQUISICIÓN, 162 APRENDIZAJE Y EVALUACIÓN DE LA LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA 2014 10. Referencias bibliográficas ANDERSON, D. y REILLY, J. (2002): «The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Normative Data for American Sign Language», Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7: 83-119. CUMMINS, J. (1979): «Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children», Review of Educational Research, 49: 221-251. DOMÍNGUEZ, A. B. et al. (2013): PEALE: Pruebas de Evaluación Analítica de Lengua Escrita, Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, Número de asiento registral: 00/2013/4067. DOMÍNGUEZ, A. B. et al. (2014): «Analysis of reading strategies in deaf adults as a function of their language and meta-phonological skills», Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35: 1439–1456. FENSON, L. et al. (1993): Guide and technical manual for the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories, San Diego: Singular Press. HERMANS, D. et al. (2008): «The relationship between the reading and signing skills of deaf children in bilingual education programs», Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(4): 518-530. HERRERO, A. (2009): Gramática Didáctica de la lengua de signos española (LSE), Madrid: S.M. HOLZINGER, D. y FELLINGER, J. (2014): «Sign language and Reading Comprehension». En: Marschark, M.; Tang, G. y Knoors, H. (eds.): Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education, New York: Oxford University Press: 102-133. MANN, W. y MARSHALL, C. (2012): «Investigating Deaf Children’s Vocabulary Knowledge in British Sign Language», Language Learning, 62(4): 1024-1051 MAYBERRY, R. I. (1994): «The importance of childhood to language acquisition: Insights from American Sign Language». En: Goodman, J.C. y Nusbaum, H.C. (eds.): The Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Speech Sounds to Words, Cambridge: MIT Press: 57-90. MAYER, C. y WELLS, G. (1996): «Can the linguistic interdependence theory support a bilingual-bicultural model of literacy education for deaf students?», Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1: 93-107. NEUROTH-GIMBRONE, C. y LIGIODICE, C. (1992): «A co-operative bilingual language program for deaf adolescents», Sign Language Studies, 74: 79-91. OUELLETTE, G. P. (2006): «What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension», Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3): 554–566. PÉREZ MARTÍN, M. el al. (2013): «Desarrollo del vocabulario temprano en niños con implante coclear escolarizados en centros con bilingüismo oral-signado», Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 34: 85-97. RINALDI, P. el al. (2014): «Sign Vocabulary in Deaf Toddlers Exposed to Sign Language Since Birth», Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(3): 303-318. RODRÍGUEZ, I. R. el al. (2014): «La evaluación del desarrollo temprano del vocabulario en LSE». En: Actas en vídeo del Congreso CNLSE 2014. (en línea) ‹https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZqTbxQ_iIo&ind ex=9&list=PLHfLt3UTyN9NKluRKdZLr0j6orfmgqYhl›.
PONENCIAS Y COMUNICACIONES DEL CONGRESO CNLSE SOBRE ADQUISICIÓN, APRENDIZAJE Y EVALUACIÓN DE LA LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA 2014 163 VALMASEDA, M. et al. (2013): «Evaluación de la competencia gramatical en LSE: proceso de adaptación del BSL Receptive Skill test (Test de Habilidades Receptivas)». En: Actas en vídeo del Congreso CNLSE 2013. (en línea) ‹https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE4pO9a-u5Q&index=13&list=PLHfLt3UTy N9M2mHP4zUVcVf2Lc40MOCoo›. WOOLFE, T. et al. (2010): «Early vocabulary development in deaf native signers: a British Sign Language adaptation of the communicative development inventories», Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51: 322–331.
Page 1 and 2:
ACTAS DEL CONGRESO CNLSE Sobre adqu
Page 3:
ACTAS del Congreso CNLSE sobre adqu
Page 6 and 7:
6 ÍNDICE Valoración de las habili
Page 8 and 9:
8 ÍNDICE La lengua de signos en lo
Page 10 and 11:
ACTAS DEL CONGRESO CNLSE SOBRE ADQU
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 17:
4. PONENCIAS Y COMUNICACIONES
Page 20 and 21:
PONENCIAS Y COMUNICACIONES DEL CONG
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112: PONENCIAS Y COMUNICACIONES DEL CONG
Page 117: PONENCIAS Y COMUNICACIONES DEL CONG
Page 188 and 189: CONTENIDOS •• Mensajes breves s
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
show all

ACTAS DEL CONGRESO CNLSE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?