20.07.2013 Views

Bet kvailas žmogus įgis supratimą, Kai laukinė a - Logos

Bet kvailas žmogus įgis supratimą, Kai laukinė a - Logos

Bet kvailas žmogus įgis supratimą, Kai laukinė a - Logos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LEONID KARPOV<br />

66<br />

LOGOS 42<br />

2005 BALANDIS • BIRÞELIS<br />

LEONID KARPOV<br />

Kauno technologijos universitetas<br />

NEBÛTIES PROBLEMA<br />

The Non-Being Problem<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Gauta 2004-12-10<br />

Pabaiga. Pradþia „<strong>Logos</strong>“ Nr. 41<br />

This paper is dedicated to the problem of non-being. The metaphysical category of non-being is rather<br />

indefinite because it has practically not been studied by scholars and philosophers. This situation springs<br />

from specific features of European culture emphasising existence and life, unlike Egyptian and Tibetan<br />

cultures. To define the category of non-being means to set its place within the context “God – being”,<br />

i.e. to find out the relations between the mentioned concepts. Second, we need to clarify the implication<br />

of nothing that underlies being and non-being.<br />

For the Christian religion, God created the Universe from nothing that separates Him from it. In a<br />

sense, He is transcendent, beyond space and time. Before the Creation, just God existed. It signifies<br />

that even nothing was created by the Lord. In turn, created nothing must be understood as an absolute<br />

absence. The transcendence of God implies that He is not present in our world. In other words, God<br />

is not identical to nothing as an absolute absence. He is nothing in the sense of substance, i.e. He is<br />

Nothing producing nothing (absolute absence) and the world. Divine Nothing exists in the sense pointed<br />

to by the Holy Bible: “I am that I am” (other translations of the Hebrew text: “I am the Being”, “I am<br />

the Existing One”, “I am who I am”, etc).<br />

The Antique world identifies non-being with absence. For example, for Democritus, non-being is<br />

emptiness in the physical sense – a cavity (unfilled space). For Plato, non-being is a part of becoming<br />

– our empirical world. Chinese philosophers even introduced a gradation of non-being. Aristotle transforms<br />

the non-being concept into a notion of possibility existing in the empirical world.<br />

I think non-being primarily concerns being, like Aristotle’s possibility dominates reality (being).<br />

Analogically motion conditions rest. In the psychological realm, non-being may be identified with unconsciousness.<br />

RAKTAÞODÞIAI. Bûtis, nebûtis, niekas, kas, sàmoningumas, nesàmoningumas, Dievas, Ðëtonas, Liuciferis.<br />

KEY WORDS. Being, non-being, nothing, thing, consciousness, unconsciousness, God, Satan, Lucifer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!