04.07.2013 Views

COMPTES RENDUS - AFEC

COMPTES RENDUS - AFEC

COMPTES RENDUS - AFEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comptes rendus<br />

account the spread of cotton is stated as having started in the Yuan in<br />

northern Suzhou and Songjiang préfectures, but when its commercial<br />

importance is somewhat surprisingly dated only to the Ming, one would<br />

like to hâve been provided with more detailed explanations.<br />

During the early Ming period, the well-known pressures put on<br />

Suzhou at the beginning of the Ming by Zhu Yuanzhang could hâve been<br />

maintained, in Marmé's view, if a Zhu Yuanzhang-like emperor would<br />

hâve succeeded the founder. Marmé relativizes their impact, however, and<br />

describes in détail Suzhou's vicissitudes under subséquent emperors and<br />

state régulations; he then dates the nadir of Suzhou's fortunes to the early<br />

fifteenth century. Within this early économie history, Marmé is not always<br />

consistent: there are fréquent sentences stating that Suzhou ("and the surrounding<br />

préfectures") bore the highest levels of land tax in the empire,<br />

while other data are presented that show that such was not strictly true in a<br />

relative sensé. In gênerai, however, both gênerai policies, which continued<br />

to stress agricultural taxes, and their unintended opportunities for évasion,<br />

tended to favor a trend toward increased commercialization throughout the<br />

necessary fifteenth-century reforms, helped by Suzhou's closeness to a<br />

foreign market. Exactly because of the importance of Suzhou's agricultural<br />

taxes for the state, the crown's fortunes remained hostage to the<br />

économie well-being and minimal coopération of the prefecture's most<br />

heavily taxed landholders.<br />

In Suzhou's agricultural history in particular, Marmé makes a consistent<br />

effort to présent quantitative data to back up his narrative, or he<br />

déclares honestly that they are lacking. However, as soon as social trends<br />

are commented upon, his touch with reality seems less assured; the discussion<br />

on tax captains, for example, seems to me more based upon what<br />

should hâve happened theoretically, rather than what we know did happen.<br />

Marmé claims that Suzhou achieved hegemony in China by the late<br />

fifteenth century (p. 143), because the Ming state's policies triggered<br />

Suzhou's commoditization, and the sale of thèse Suzhou products caused<br />

the articulation of marketing hiérarchies elsewhere. Basic to this hegemony,<br />

in addition to rice, was silk, and Marmé gives us some glimpses of its<br />

market. His treatment remains centered on the agricultural background,<br />

417

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!