Vol.XXXVII, Suppl. 1 - Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia

Bibliografi a
iL poLiEtiLEnE nELLa artroprotEsi totaLE di ginocchio
1 Denkena B, Reichstein M, van der Meer M,
et al. Wear analysis and fi nishing of bioceramic
implant surfaces. Stud Health Technol
Inform 2008;133:75-82.
2 Heimke G, Leyen S, Willmann G. Knee arthoplasty:
recently developed ceramics offer
new solutions. Biomaterials 2002;23:1539-
51.
3 Bankston AB, Cates H, Ritter MA, et al. Polyethylene
wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res 1995;317:7-13.
4 Bohl JR, Bohl WR, Postak PD, et al. The Coventry
Award: the effects of shelf life on clinical
outcome for gamma sterilized polyethylene
tibial components. Clin Orthop Relat Res
1999;367:28-38.
5 Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, et al.
Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: infl uence
of tibial baseplate surface fi nish and
sterilization of polyethylene insert. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2702-8.
6 Conditt MA, Ismaily SK, Alexander JW, et al.
Backside wear of ultrahigh molecular weight
polyethylene tibial inserts. J Bone Joint Surg
Am 2004;86:1031-7.
7 Shanbhag AS, Bailey HO, Hwang DS, et al.
Quantitative analysis of ultrahigh molecular
weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris
associated with total knee replacements. J
Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:100-10.
8 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al.
Insall Award Paper: why are total knee arthroplasties
failing today? Clin Orthop Relat
Res 2002;404:7-13.
9 Taki N, Goldberg VM, Kraay MJ, et al.
Backside wear of Miller-Galante I and Insall-
Burstein II tibial inserts. Clin Orthop Relat Res
2004;428:198-206.
10 Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Epidemiology of osteolysis:
backside implant wear. Instr Course
Lect 2004;53:243-9.
11 Landy mm, Walker PS. Wear of ultra-highmolecular-weight
polyethylene components
of 90 retrieved knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty
1998;3(Suppl):S73-85.
12 Holt G, Murnaghan C, Reilly J, et al. The biology
of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 2007;460:240-52.
13 Lonner JH, Siliski JM, Scott RD. Prodromes
of failure of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.
1999;14:488-92.
14 Li S, Scuderi G, Furman BD, et al. Assessment
of backside wear from the analysis of
55 retrieved tibial inserts. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 2002;404:75-82.
15 Lombardi AV Jr, Ellison BS, Berend KR. Polyethylene
wear is infl uenced by manufacturing
technique in modular TKA. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 2008;466:2798-805.
16 Naudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, et al.
Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:53-
64.
17 McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, et al. Development
of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high
molecular weight polyethylene for total hip
replacements. J Orthop Res 1999;17:157-
67.
18 McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, et al. Effect of
sterilization method and other modifi cations
on the wear resistance of acetabular cups
made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene:
a hip-simulator study. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 2000;82:1708-25.
19 Williams IR, Mayor MB, Collier JP. The impact
of sterilization method on wear in
knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res
1998;356:170-80.
20 Willie BM, Bloebaum RD, Ashrafi S, et al.
Oxidative degradation in highly crosslinked
and conventional polyethylene after 2
years of real-time shelf aging. Biomaterials
2006;27:2275-84.
21 Ries MD. Highly cross-linked polyethylene:
the debate is over—in opposition. J Arthroplasty
2005;20(Suppl 2):59-62.
22 Ries MD, Pruitt L. Effect of cross-linking on
the microstructure and mechanical properties
of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;440:149-56.
23 Wang A, Yau SS, Essner A, et al. A highly
crosslinked UHMWPE for CR and PS
total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty
2008;23:559-66.
24 Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, Jasty M, et al.
Knee-simulator testing of conventional and
cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. J Arthroplasty
2004;19:887-97.
25 Muratoglu OK, Rubash HE, Bragdon CR,
et al. Simulated normal gait wear testing of a
s49
highly crosslinked polyethylene tibial insert. J
Arthroplasty 2007;22:435-44.
26 Hodrick JT, Severson EP, McAlister DS, et al.
Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for
use in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 2008;466:2806-12.
27 Iwakiri K, Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, et al. In
vivo comparison of wear particles between
highly crosslinked polyethylene and conventional
polyethylene in the same design of total
knee arthroplasties. J Biomed Mater Res B
Appl Biomater 2009;91:799-804.
28 Gioe TJ, Bowman KR. A randomized comparison
of all-polyethylene and metal-backed
tibial components. Clin Orthop Relat Res
2000;(380):108-15.
29 Dojcinovic S, Ait Si Selmi T, Servien E, et al.
A comparison of all-polyethylene and metalbacked
tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar
Mot 2007;93:364-72.
30 McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Charron KD,
et al. The role of polyethylene design on postoperative
TKA fl exion: an analysis of 1534
cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:108-
14.
31 Omori G, Onda N, Shimura M, et al. The
effect of geometry of the tibial polyethylene
insert on the tibiofemoral contact kinematics
in Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty.
J Orthop Sci 2009;14:754-60.
32 Lachiewicz PF, Geyer MR. The use of
highly cross-linked polyethylene in total
knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg
2011;19:143-51.
33 Jarrett BT, Cofske J, Rosenberg AE, et al. In
vivo biological response to vitamin E and
vitamin-E-doped polyethylene. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 2010;92:2672-81.
34 Huot JC, Van Citters DW, Currier JH, et al.
Evaluating the suitability of highly crosslinked
and remelted materials for use in posterior
stabilized knees. J Biomed Mater Res B
Appl Biomater 2010;95:298-307.
35 Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive
for optimizing fl exion after TKR. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 2003;(416):174-6.
36 Dennis DA, Komistek RD. Mobile-bearing
total knee arthroplasty: design factors in
minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res
2006;452:70-7.