06.01.2013 Views

Vol.XXXVII, Suppl. 1 - Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia

Vol.XXXVII, Suppl. 1 - Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia

Vol.XXXVII, Suppl. 1 - Giornale Italiano di Ortopedia e Traumatologia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bibliografi a<br />

La nostra EspEriEnZa con La coppa in tMt<br />

nELLE rEVisioni acEtaBoLari s65<br />

1 Herberts P, Ahnfelt L, Malchau H, et al. Multicenter<br />

clinical trials and their value I assessing<br />

total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat<br />

Res 1989;249:48-55.<br />

2 Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of<br />

a Porous Tantalum Uncemented Acetabular<br />

Cup in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty<br />

2005;20:1002-9.<br />

3 Hacking SA, Bobyn JD, Toh K, et al. Fibrous<br />

tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum.<br />

J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:631-8.<br />

4 Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, et al. The<br />

optimum pore size for the fi xation of poroussurfaced<br />

metal implants by the ingrowth of<br />

bone. Clin Orthop 1980;150:263-70.<br />

5 Cohen R. A porous tantalum metal: basic science.<br />

Am J. Orthop 2002;31:216-7.<br />

6 Fitzpatrick D, Ahn P, Brown T, et al. Friction<br />

coeffi cients of porous tantalum and cancellous<br />

and cortical bone. Presented at the 21st Annual<br />

American Society of Biomechaniccs; 1997.<br />

7 Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM<br />

Acetabular defect classifi cation and surgical<br />

reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a<br />

6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty<br />

1994;9:33-44.<br />

8 Fernández-Fairen M, Murcia A, Blanco A,<br />

et al. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty<br />

acetabular cups to porous tantalum components:<br />

a 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty<br />

2010;25:865-72. .<br />

9 Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW,<br />

et al. Acetabular revisions using trabecular<br />

metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty<br />

2009;24:64-8.<br />

10 Malkani AL, Price MR, Crawford CH 3rd,<br />

et al. Acetabular component revision using a<br />

porous tantalum biomaterial: a case series. J<br />

Arthroplasty 2009;24:1068-73.<br />

11 Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, et al.<br />

Modular tantalum augments for acetabular<br />

defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop<br />

Relat Res 2009;467:199-205.<br />

12 Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular<br />

porous metal augments for treatment<br />

of severe acetabular bone loss during revision<br />

hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res<br />

2004;429:201-8.<br />

13 Flecher X, Sporer S, Paprosky W. Management<br />

of severe bone loss in Acetabular revision<br />

using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty<br />

2008;23:949-55.<br />

14 Flecher X, Paprosky W, Grillo JC, et al. Do<br />

tantalum components provide adequate primary<br />

fi xation in all acetabular revisions?<br />

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:235-<br />

41.<br />

15 Kim WY, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP, et al.<br />

Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular<br />

shells in revision total hip replacement: two<br />

to four year clinical and ra<strong>di</strong>ographic results.<br />

Hip Int 2008;18:17-22.<br />

16 Springer BD, Fehring TK, Griffi n WL, et al.<br />

Why Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Fails<br />

Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:166-73.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!