iberiul-kavkasiuri enaTmecniereba XXXIX

More documents

Recommendations

Info

116 r. lolua feature of prosody and is spread in all word. According to S. Kodzasov's viewpoint, a pharyngealization pick comes on the first syllable (i. e. vowel), but if in a word there is a hushing, uvular and pharyngeal consonant, then maximum of pharyngealization comes on it. According to my observation, this viewpoint should be shared. Specialists' recordings speak about the fact, that in Udi pharyngealization comes on whole word: a number of the lexemes with two-and more syllables, where according to researchers' viewpoint, all vowels occur as pharyngealized, is large. The cases often occur, when pharyngeal vowels are marked in such word-forming elements and affixes, in which, separately, there is a simple vowel. It should be noted, that according to researchers' recordings, in Udi pharyngealized vowels are not attested in affixes (as it was mentioned there are alternation of simple and pharyngealized vowels). It is natural, that this does not speak in favor of phonemity of pharyngealized vowels. The mentioned situation should be caused by the fact, that in Udi in a word the maximum of pharyngealization, as it was mentioned, comes on an initial vowel, or initial pharyngeal, uvular or hushing consonant and prefixation is almost broken. Alternation of pharyngealized and non-pharyngealized graphical variants in affixes points to the fact, that in Udi pharyngealization is a feature of prosody. Affixes are just those entries which are morphologically connected with a stem and it is clear, that in these elements pharyngealization is defined by other entry (or a stem). Frequent alternation of pharyngealized vowels is noteworthy, when the cases of pharyngealized alternation are noticeable with non-corelete simple vowels. There are cases, when a simple vowel assimilates a pharyngealized vowel and as a result of this it gains pharyngealizity. It also points to the fact, that in Udi the pharyngealization process is not a segmentic feature of a vowel. In special literature there were several attempts to confirm the phonemicity of pharyngealized vowels. I think, in Udi generally pharyngealization and not any pharyngealized sound – a vowel or a consonant has a distinctive function. As it is clear pharyngealization was characteristic of common Lezgian. The existance of identic sound-cornespondences among the Lezgian languages from the pharyngealization standpoint points to it. There are cases, when a pharyngeal vowel evidenced in the Lezgian and Dagestanian languages is lost in Udi; but instead of it there occurs pharyngealization. It makes me to think, that in Udi pharyngealization is a compensative process, that is caused by weakening, loosing or moving in other consonants of pharyngeal consonants. To my opinion, an issue of so called intensive consonants in Udi is connected with pharyngealization. This is supported by the fact, that in most cases intensives are attested in one word at pharyngealized vowels. During comparing the researchers, materials this is supported by the cases of alternation of pharyngealized vowels and intensive consonants. It should be noted that some contemprorary researchers (T. Maisak, V. Schulze in Udi verify not intensive, but velarized hushing consonants. Velarization of hushing, that gives consonants different tembre, should be discussed as accompanying process of pharyngealization. I believe, that just relevant process of pharyngealization/velarization of hushings misleaded those researchers, who assume intensive consonants in Udi phonological system. I think, that distinguishing of velarized phonemes in Udi is not correct.
iberiul-kavkasiuri enaTmecniereba XXXIX 2011 qeTevan margiani-subari subkategoriebisTvis svanur enaSi (indikativi, konkluzivi, renarativi, dubitativi) subkategoriaTa SemadgenlobaSi, romlebic teqstis kategoriebia da gamoxataven mTqmelis damokidebulebas naTqvamisadmi, vfiqrobT, um- Tavresi adgili evidencialobas miekuTvneba, vinaidan igi msoflios yvela enisTvis aris damaxasiaTebeli; sxva sakiTxia, rogor aris is gamoxatuli ama Tu im enaSi _ gramatikulad Tu mxolod aRweriTad, leqsikuri saSualebebiT, sxvagvarad: es subkategoria gramatikuli kategoriaa Tu modaloba. zogadad evidencialobisa da modalobis urTierTmimarTebis Sesaxeb enaTmecnierebaSi arsebobs sami Tvalsazrisi: a) evidencialoba da modaloba dezunqciur urTierTmimarTebaSi arian (anu arsebiTad gansxvavdebian erTmaneTisagan) _ aseT SemTxvevaSi saubroben evidencializmze am sityvis viwro gagebiT. b) evidencialoba da modaloba inkluziur mimarTebaSia erTmaneTTan, anu evidencialobaSi CarTulia informaciis mimarT mTqmelis damokidebuleba sandoobis (saeWvo-savaraudobis) kuTxiTac _ aseT SemTxvevaSi saqme gvaqvs am terminis (evidencialobis) farTo mniSvnelobasTan (Tumca aris piriqiTac: ufro xSirad evidencialoba SehyavT epistemikuri modalobis SemadgenlobaSi); g) mesame mosazrebiT, modaloba da evidencialoba xSirad faraven erTmaneTs. specialur literaturaSi ZiriTadad gamoyofen evidencialur formaTa oTx saxeobas (evidencials): indikativs, konkluzivs, renarativsa da dubitativs. indikativi (sxva terminologiiT konfirmativi an dadasturebuli modusi) niSnavs mTqmelis iseT damokidebulebas mis mier gadmocemul informaciasTan, roca codna am informaciis Sesaxeb mis cnobier samyaroSi integrirebulia da gadmogvcems rogorc sakuTars (is SeiZleba pirdapiri aRqmis Sedegic iyos an sxva wyarodan miRebuli, magram mTqmelis mier ukve gaTavisebuli); magaliTad, roca mTqmeli ambobs: `IV
Page 1 and 2:
iberiul-kavkasiuri enaTmecniereba X
Page 3 and 4:
ARN. CHIKOBAVA INSTITUTE OF LINGUIS
Page 5 and 6:
mTavari redaqtori vaja Sengelia sar
Page 7 and 8:
S i n a a r s i _ CONTENTS g. k v a
Page 9 and 10:
S i n a a r s i 7 m. s a G l i a n
Page 11 and 12:
XXXIX 2011 iberiul-kavkasiuri enaTm
Page 13 and 14:
`Kovel poezias waayarbebda~ simon j
Page 15 and 16:
`Kovel poezias waayarbebda~ ...ar i
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
akademikosi qeTevan lomTaTiZe da ib
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Cveni maswavlebeli 29 - Нет, я
Page 33 and 34:
Cveni maswavlebeli 31 sergei pazovi
Page 35 and 36:
Cveni maswavlebeli 33 Lomtatidze’
Page 37 and 38:
mcire mogoneba qeTevan lomTaTiZeze
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
predikatuli sintagma da sintaqsuri
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Tavazianobis etiketi da mesame piri
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Tuli Tanwyobili winadadebis definic
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
naTesaobiTi brunvis alomorfTa ganaw
Page 69 and 70:
naTesaobiTi brunvis alomorfTa ganaw
Page 71 and 72: naTesaobiTi brunvis alomorfTa ganaw
Page 77 and 78: iberiul-kavkasiuri enaTmecniereba X
Page 79 and 80: 76 adgilis zmnisarTebi svanur diale
Page 81 and 82: 78 adgilis zmnisarTebi svanur diale
Page 83 and 84: 80 Temis sakiTxisaTvis III seriis f
Page 89 and 90: 86 III kavSirebiTi _ gav-zrd-ode ga
Page 93 and 94: poetur-stilistikuri Taviseburebebis
Page 103 and 104: 98 zogi zmnuri fuZe da zmniswinis s
Page 105 and 106: 100 zogi zmnuri fuZe da zmniswinis
Page 107 and 108: 102 zogi zmnuri fuZe da zmniswinis
Page 109 and 110: faringalizaciis sakiTxisaTvis udiur
Page 121: faringalizaciis sakiTxisaTvis udiur
Page 125 and 126: subkategoriebisTvis svanur enaSi 11
Page 133 and 134: T. maxarobliZe 127 Ti SexedviT, sak
Page 135 and 136: T. maxarobliZe 129 bis safuZvelze.
Page 137 and 138: T. maxarobliZe 131 magaliTad, zogad
Page 139 and 140: C. Names of organizations and firms
Page 141 and 142: nasesxeli frazeologizmebis struqtur
Page 165 and 166: svanur frazeologiur gamonaTqvamTa l
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
pasiuri da saurTierTo seamantika ga
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
O dp {-en}(/-en/~/-n) da O dp {-T}(
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
marcvlis gaxsnasTan dakavSirebuli s
Page 205 and 206:
marcvlis gaxsnasTan dakavSirebuli s
Page 207 and 208:
mravalgzisobis gamoxatva qarTuli en
Page 209 and 210:
mravalgzisobis gamoxatva qarTuli en
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
dalocvisa da wyevla-muqaris gamomxa
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
qarTuli enis samxruli dialeqtebi ko
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
qarTuli idiomatikonis lingvistur-le
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
`vefxistyaosnis~ avtoris sadaurobis
Page 245 and 246:
`vefxistyaosnis~ avtoris sadaurobis
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
fuZedrekad zmnaTa mimGeoburi formeb
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
arsebiT saxelTa dajgufebis axali pr
Page 257 and 258:
arsebiT saxelTa dajgufebis axali pr
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
k. vamlingi, rus. enaze). m u x a d
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
« Il n’y a pas de petites cultur
Page 267 and 268:
`ar arseboben patara kulturebi~ (gi
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
g i o r g i S a r a S i Z e 267 194
Page 275 and 276:
g i o r g i S a r a S i Z e 269 _ u
Page 277 and 278:
g i o r g i S a r a S i Z e 271 _ a
Page 279 and 280:
m i x e i l q u r d i a n i riv pro
Page 281 and 282:
m i x e i l q u r d i a n i Tis mec
Page 283 and 284:
l a m a r a n o z a Z e namSromeli.
Page 285 and 286:
l a l i i o r d a n i S v i l i li
show all

iberiul-kavkasiuri enaTmecniereba XXXIX

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?