24.11.2014 Views

Avaa tiedosto - TamPub - Tampereen yliopisto

Avaa tiedosto - TamPub - Tampereen yliopisto

Avaa tiedosto - TamPub - Tampereen yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The risk discourse in turn includes an understanding of violence both as a physical<br />

and psychological risk factor and endangerment of safety. The accurate content and criteria<br />

of this risk factor vary in the data. The risk discourse is mostly and most openly<br />

used when children are concerned. Potential risks of violence for adults are pondered on<br />

remarkably less often and less directly. Like the interaction discourse the risk discourse<br />

is used to both admit and deny the weight of violence in decisions over custody disputes.<br />

The third identified discourse I named the child-rearing discourse, which is not as<br />

visible in the data as are the other discourses on violence. The child-rearing discourse<br />

means dealing with violence against children from the point of view of discipline. It was<br />

used to evaluate whether the allegations of violence used against children were true or<br />

not and when the risk of violence was described to be small and irrelevant from the<br />

standpoint of the decision.<br />

Violence in social workers’ reports<br />

Social workers’ reports on families are analysed in Chapter 8. These reports play a central<br />

role as providers of expert knowledge in child custody dispute cases taken to court.<br />

They present and assess extensively the family relationships and phases of lives of parents<br />

and children. I examined how violence was written about in the reports and what<br />

conclusions were made based on them.<br />

Two things emerged as the main results in the analysis. First, it seems to be fairly<br />

common to leave descriptions of violence out of the reports. Second, when violence is<br />

eventually written about in the reports, it is often done inaccurately, by using euphemisms<br />

and avoiding taking a stand. I analysed 94 reports, all of which were from court<br />

cases in which allegations of violence were presented. Fifty-four of theses reports included<br />

stories of violence inflicted by one or both of the parents. In 25 reports, social<br />

workers take a stand on violence. The figures reveal that allegations of violence are not<br />

often included in the reports and that social workers’ own stands show in them even less<br />

often. These results apply to both intimate partner violence inflicted by adults and violence<br />

used against children.<br />

Next the results of those 25 reports are summarized which revealed the social<br />

workers’ own stands on alleged violence. First, in assessing whether violence has been<br />

used, only one parent’s story does not seem to make social workers convinced. The as-<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!