05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.78<br />

Fuel bag tank extension<br />

Gap between extension<br />

and small diameter<br />

section<br />

Chapter 6 – Overflow or Pressure from Air-to-Air Refuelling<br />

Figure 6.9: No. 1 Tank Cell 4 Vent Connection<br />

Small diameter section<br />

Location of ‘Vent’ label<br />

tape<br />

Large diameter section<br />

37 In order to assist the <strong>Review</strong>, a trial was carried out at RAF Kinloss to investigate where fluid would track if<br />

released in the area of the No. 1 Tank rear vent connection (see Figure 6.8 and 6.9). Although unable to replicate<br />

the exact pitch attitude of XV230, the results showed that fluid would track back into the No. 7 Tank Dry Bay<br />

and some would pool on the lower panel. Larger quantities of fuel (several litres) were required in order to cause<br />

the fuel to disperse widely over the panel. In addition to the ‘on aircraft’ trial tracking the movement of the<br />

fluid, the connection was also subjected to a bench test under pressure. Leaks were not apparent up to 5psi on<br />

the test specimen with the jubilee clip on the wider part of the vent pipe. However, as noted above by QinetiQ,<br />

the jubilee clip had potential to slip rearwards over the narrower section if located over the weld. Given the<br />

difference in the two diameters this would result in a large leak, as can be seen from the photograph above.<br />

Vent pipe couplings<br />

6.79 <strong>The</strong>re is also evidence that, in addition to the possibility of a leak from the direct vent connections to Cells 1<br />

and 4 of No. 1 Tank, fuel may also leak from the FRS couplings in the main vent system. In 1998 a technical<br />

improvement38 was suggested to the IPTs predecessor, the Support Management Group. In proposing a<br />

Modification to the high-level float switches of No. 1 tank an engineer at RAF Kinloss was trying to deal with<br />

a recurring problem of minor fuel spills from the No. 1 Tank. In his explanation of the problem, he wrote: “Of<br />

course fuel doesn’t always flow freely through the vent lines, often it finds a way to leak through these lines at<br />

various connections and soaks either Rib 1 port or starboard. This alone causes a large quantity of fuel to soak<br />

all the equipment there” (emphasis added).<br />

6.80<br />

6.81<br />

Several of the FRS connections in the fuel vent pipes are directly above the No. 7 Tank Dry Bay and fuel dripping<br />

from them would drop onto the lower panel and pool.<br />

I am satisfied, in the light of the above, that there are several ways in which fuel can migrate into the No. 7 Tank<br />

Dry Bay from the aircraft vent system and pool on the lower panel.<br />

Venting could occur without blow-off<br />

6.82<br />

<strong>The</strong> incident on XV235 shows the potential for fuel to enter the vent system in the event of the No. 1 tank Cell<br />

4 overfilling, allowing fuel to leak into the area of the No. 7 Tank Dry Bay. This could happen without reaching<br />

an internal tank pressure sufficient to cause blow-off. It is therefore possible that a leak from the vent system,<br />

37 NAEDIT/1505/09/14/Task 01, dated September 2009.<br />

38 SMG/512712/16/SM60a1, dated 18 November 1998.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!