05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 18 – Accident <strong>The</strong>ory and High-Risk Technologies<br />

18.9 Seventhly, do not simply blame individuals whilst ignoring more fundamental organisational causes. Human<br />

error does not take place in a vacuum. Investigators of accidents often fall prey to the temptation to focus<br />

simply on performance of individuals whilst ignoring the organisational deficiencies which may have caused<br />

or contributed to the individuals’ ignorance or sub-optimal performance. Such flawed attribution sometimes<br />

arises because of the relative ease with which it is possible to point to individual human failures and the<br />

relative difficulty in identifying and analysing the more complex ‘task’, ‘situational’, ‘institutional’ and/or<br />

‘organisational’ factors that shape human performance. Most people involved in serious accidents are neither<br />

stupid nor reckless, although they may have been blind to the consequences of their actions. 11 Key to any<br />

accident investigation is understanding why they acted as they did and the organisational factors that shaped<br />

their approach and behaviour.<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance of investigating organisational causes<br />

18.10<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance of looking at organisational causes was recognised by International Civil Aviation Organisation<br />

(ICAO) in the 1990s when the following passage was added to its Annex 13 regarding the standards and<br />

recommended practices for air accident investigators throughout the world:<br />

“1.17. Organisational and Management information [that accident reports should include].<br />

Pertinent information concerning the organisations and their management involved in<br />

influencing the operation of the aircraft. <strong>The</strong> organisations include, for example, the<br />

operator, the air traffic services, airway, aerodrome and weather service agencies, and the<br />

regulatory authority. <strong>The</strong> information should include, but not be limited to, organisational<br />

structures and functions, resources, economic status, management policies and practices,<br />

and regulatory framework.” 12<br />

18.11 In their book Beyond Aviation Human Factors, 13 Maurino, Reason, Johnston and Lee examined how the<br />

scope of accident analysis had been extended from the individual to the collective, i.e. managerial and<br />

organisational. <strong>The</strong> authors emphasised that human error does not take place in vacuum, but within the<br />

context of organisations which either resist or foster it. <strong>The</strong> central contention of their book (with which I<br />

concur) is succinctly put as follows:<br />

“[N]o matter how well equipment is designed, no matter how sensible regulations are, no<br />

matter how much humans excel in their individual or small team’s performance, they can<br />

never be better than the system that bounds them.” 14<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dryden Report (1992)<br />

18.12<br />

<strong>The</strong> central case study considered by the authors of Beyond Aviation Human Factors is the inquiry by the<br />

Honourable Mr Justice Virgil P Moshansky into the crash at Dryden, Ontario, on 10 March 1989. 15 <strong>The</strong> cause<br />

of the accident was pilot error: Captain Morwood failed to de-ice the wings of his Air Ontario F-28 jet causing<br />

Flight 1363 to crash shortly after take off. <strong>The</strong> authors said the investigation might have been closed within a<br />

few weeks of the crash, had conventional wisdom been applied. In ‘<strong>The</strong> Dryden Report’, however, Moshansky<br />

“tore apart” the Canadian aviation system, and adopted a system-analysis approach, with emphasis on an<br />

examination of human performance. Commenting on his report Commissioner Moshansky later said:<br />

“Whenever human beings are involved in a complex system, there will be failures both<br />

active and latent. <strong>The</strong> concept of human factors contributing to aviation accidents has<br />

been around since the 1930’s, when it was first advanced by Dr Robert McFarland, a<br />

renowned American Psychologist. However, cynicism and a lack of understanding of<br />

the concept prevailed, with the result that accident investigations generally ignored it or<br />

regarded it with scepticism, until Dryden.<br />

11 See James Reason, Human Error, 1990, page 216.<br />

12 See Ninth Edition of ICAO Annex 13 (Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation), July 2001.<br />

13 Daniel E Maurino, James Reason, Neil Johnston and Rob B Lee, Beyond Aviation Human Factors, 1995.<br />

14 Ibid, pages x-xi.<br />

15 Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Air Ontario Crash at Dryden, Ontario by Honourable Mr Justice Virgil P Moshansky (1992).<br />

461

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!