05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

16.5<br />

16.6<br />

16.7<br />

442<br />

16 <strong>The</strong> Coroner’s Rule 43 recommendation , that the <strong>Nimrod</strong> fleet should be grounded, was the result of a<br />

misunderstanding by him of the meaning of the term ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable). <strong>The</strong> ‘R’ in<br />

ALARP has a temporal element: a reasonable time is allowed to implement appropriate measures to mitigate<br />

identified risks. If this were not the case, few commercial or military aircraft would ever fly. (See generally<br />

Chapter 9).<br />

I have conducted a detailed and wide-ranging investigation lasting many months, including interviewing<br />

hundreds of witnesses and examining thousands of documents. I have found nothing to justify the Coroner’s<br />

(widely-publicised) remark that the MOD had a “cavalier approach to safety”. 17 Nor, in my judgment, was there<br />

anything before him to justify such a remark. 18 <strong>The</strong> problem is not indifference to safety. <strong>The</strong> problem is the<br />

numerous systemic shortcomings in the MOD’s safety and airworthiness structure, culture and procedure which<br />

need addressing. (See generally Chapters 19 to 28).<br />

<strong>The</strong> difficulties arising from inquests running in parallel to inquiries was highlighted in 1987 by Mr Desmond<br />

Fennell QC in his Report into <strong>The</strong> King’s Cross Underground Fire. 19 Reform of the ‘arcane’ Coroner’s system<br />

was recommended by Sir Anthony Clarke in 2001 in his Report into the identification issues following <strong>The</strong><br />

Marchioness Disaster. 20 A Draft Coroners Bill was published by the Government in June 2006. <strong>The</strong> Government<br />

announced its intention to bring forward the Coroners Bill in the Queen’s Speech in December 2008. This long<br />

overdue reform is to be welcomed.<br />

16 Rule 43 of the Coroners Rules provides: “A Coroner who believes that action should be taken to prevent the recurrence of fatalities similar to that<br />

in respect of which the inquest is being held may announce at the inquest that he is reporting the matter in writing to the person or authority who<br />

may have power to take such action and he may report the matter accordingly.”<br />

17 Coroner’s narrative verdict, 23 May 2008, page 49, second paragraph.<br />

18 See, in particular, his misunderstanding of ‘ALARP’.<br />

19 <strong>The</strong> Investigation into the King’s Cross Underground Fire (Cm 499) by Mr Desmond Fennell QC (p. 141).<br />

20 Report of the Public Inquiry into the Identification of Victims Following Major Transport Accidents (Cm 5012) by the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Clarke,<br />

dated March 2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!