05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

500<br />

Recommendation 21.A.2: <strong>The</strong> Head of the MAA (the Regulator) shall be a full-time 3-Star appointment<br />

and someone who is highly experienced and respected in the military air environment (and ideally has<br />

a background in Airworthiness Regulation).<br />

Recommendation 21.A.3: <strong>The</strong> Regulator shall be supported by co-located Technical and Operational<br />

Airworthiness Regulators at 2-Star level, supported by specialist staffs.<br />

Recommendation 21.A.4: <strong>The</strong> current RTSAs shall be folded into the MAA as a distinct regulatory function<br />

with Service specialists employed to provide appropriate input on Service-specific environmental<br />

requirements. <strong>The</strong> MAA will employ senior engineers with professional status holding Letters of<br />

Airworthiness Authority (LOAA), and experienced operators, to undertake demonstrable independent<br />

assessment for the initial release and supplementary changes to all Release to Service (RTS) issued for<br />

specific platforms. ACAS and the other Service deputies will be relieved of this specialist regulatory<br />

role.<br />

Recommendation 21.A.5: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall facilitate and ensure a comprehensive, coherent, consistent<br />

and meaningful assessment of Airworthiness in terms of Risk to Life across of all lines of development<br />

in Defence, i.e. “to provide assurance that aircraft have been designed, constructed, maintained and<br />

expected to be operated to approved standards and limitations by competent individuals who are acting<br />

as members of an approved organisation and whose work is both certified as correct and accepted on<br />

behalf of the MOD”. 11<br />

Recommendation 21.A.6: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall have a status comparable to that afforded to the CAA, with<br />

mutatis mutandis similar functions, oversight and authority performed on behalf of the Secretary of<br />

State for Defence, and set appropriately in the military context.<br />

Recommendation 21.A.7: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall have direct authority over the Equipment Authorities and<br />

AOAs and with respect to all Airworthiness regulatory policy and compliance. 12<br />

Recommendation 21.A.8: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall have authority to determine appropriate Defence Standards<br />

and contractual requirements regarding Airworthiness with Industry and be given all concomitant<br />

assurance and enforcement powers.<br />

Recommendation 21.A.9: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall be given appropriate financial, manpower and estate resources<br />

which shall be ring-fenced.<br />

Recommendation 21.A.10: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall be located in a single geographic location entirely separate<br />

from the Equipment and AOAs, in order to re-enforce its independent status and enable it to carry out<br />

its remit to govern Airworthiness for the three Services in an objective and even-handed manner.<br />

Recommendation 21.A.11: <strong>The</strong> MAA shall be responsible for devising, drafting and promulgating a<br />

concise and logically structured regulatory documentation set based on the Australian Defence Force<br />

and Defence Nuclear Safety management regulatory sets.<br />

11 Operational Airworthiness in the Australian Defence Force – definition of Airworthiness.<br />

12 This is similar to the arrangement employed by the Australian Defence Force and removes the perceived weakness of the current self-regulation<br />

system by providing for independent and over-arching assessment and assurance by the MAA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!